otto.f

If it were only for the possibility of exchanging batteries indeed, it would save a lot of irritations

Funny how people interpret the theme of a thread. Stuny posts an image of an old carriage in Landscape and here we see something which would clearly belong in Nature. Maybe I’m not thinking deep enough.

Is this on the ridge of the Ngorongoro?

Could be Turkish architecture at the left or some other moslim country?

Correct! Over to you

Not exactly, but very close. Since 2016 it's one big department with those two.

I’d prefer a Nikon Z in that case with a Leica lens adapter.

Yes

Funny that your wishes for a new M are all going into the direction of AI, whereas the digital M line started as a still manual camera with just a sensor in it instead of film. But what surprises me the most is that you don’t mention the color handling of the M11 which is way below what may be expected from a camera with that price and which is the foremost problem that should be solved in the M12. At least for a significant part of Leica’s clients.

The pity is that a respected reviewer like Sean Reid has downplayed the color problem of the M11 in comparison with the M10-R. But in my memory this problem has been communicated and even demonstrated often enough that members could have seen or smelt the smoke.

Not in Spain

I see an old car, no landscape at all, but maybe my eyes get old

Here's another shot from that place