Jump to content

Unknowen Leica: Real or fake


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello everyone,

I got an old Leica from my grandfather which I would like to sell.

However, as I hate thos selling counterfeits,- can anyone tell me the model as well as if the camera is real?

Would that be possible based on the pictures I attached?

Unfortunately my grandfather passed away quite some time ago - so there's practically no chance to ask him :/.

 

Thanks a lot for your help :)!

 

 

 

2jazvpy.jpg

 

2r38hft.jpg

 

2d7a2xe.jpg

 

25u5qhs.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a fake. Just check whether the rangefinder cam, inside on top of mount when lens is unscrewed, is round. If it is not round it is a definite fake. Even if it is, it looks like a fake. The surround on the shutter button is also a sure sign of FSU fakes as is the script on the lens cap. The quality of construction also seems to be well below Leica standard. 

 

William

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

there are many details which allow to identify russian fake. Good is what William wrote about rangefinder cam. however the most obvious is the shape of viewer window, it it far away from the 2 types of windows in Leicas. Attention: very early FEDs had windows like Leica below SN 240000, however I never saw such camera faked, they are more expensive as original.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Later FEDs (and Zorkis) had release button with inner thread, like this one. Leica kept bell type of remote release with all LTMs.

With this particular camera most probably distance between lens flange and film is not correct. The lens has infinity at 9 oclock, with this type of FEDs should be 7.

And whatever we say about russian fakes - if properly maintained the foto quality is not far away from those of Leica. Of course, if you take it in the hand you feel immediately that this is not original - winding is stiffer, tollerancies in machining were more "generous" than with Leica, partly because russians did not have rough material in western quality.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in Wetzlar last week.

 

There was a display of Leica copies in the reception area at the Leica factory, including several "Russian Leicas."

It was very interesting to compare the fakes with the actual Leica's which were displayed next to them.

 

Oldphart

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a fake. I have 4 of these. They are fun for burning through film.  There was a guy in Kiev selling them for around $50usd in the early 2000's.  He's off the map now. The glass isn't awful, they are a little krunchy mechanically but they make a great conversation piece.  Ive seen people at photo show's and military shows trying sell them off as "nazi Leica's" and historical items. Don't do that. Its not nice, very rude.

Edited by JohnnySeven
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are great fun to have. Not to mention that they are a bit liberating as far as handling goes. When I purchased mine, the aperture control was very stiff; being what it was, I judiciously applied a drop of WD40. It loosened right up and continues to move freely. No expensive CLA for my fine, Russian gem.

 

Keep it and enjoy it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in Wetzlar last week.

 

There was a display of Leica copies in the reception area at the Leica factory, including several "Russian Leicas."

It was very interesting to compare the fakes with the actual Leica's which were displayed next to them.

 

Oldphart

 

I wonder if they have a British Reid & Sigrist LTM camera there, as it would show the Leica LTM cameras up for construction standards. Apparently R&S were a bit taken aback when they saw the tolerances on the microfilm blueprints for the IIIB, from which they developed their camera in the late 1940's. Not what they were used to from making aircraft gyroscopes, especially the inertial navigation ones they were just developing for the UK "V" class jet nuclear bombers. When R&S were converting all the measurements to inches, to suit their machine tools, they took the opportunity to tighten up on the Leica tolerances. The original R&S cameras were destined for British military intelligence and the RAF, who had to be seen to be "buying British" with the civilian cameras coming afterwards. I have one of the factory development cameras bought from a retired R&S engineer and it certainly is beautifully made and has the brightest rangefinder I have seen on an LTM camera. They did not sell at all well as with the standard 2 inch Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Anastigmat, they were a few pounds more expensive (£143 in 1954) than the equivalent IIIF Leica and collapsible Summicron (£138). My father paid £150 for my M4 body only in 1967 from Lizars in Aberdeen, Scotland.  

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wilson,

YES, there was definitely one Reid camera there, a Reid III from memory but not in particularly good condition.

I think it was paired with a Leica IIIb

 

Best regards,

Oldphart

Edited by oldphart
Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest what is the serial number of the factory development camera?

I think regular series production started at 1001 and the first 100 or so did not have any flash contacts.

If your factory development camera is any different to the series product then I would love to see a pic.

(I have a Reid III #1945 in mint condition.)

 

Best regards.

Oldphart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This list (link below) of Reid Serial Nos is not complete, but it should help to place any Reid model in the overall sequence. 

 

http://www.l39sm.co.uk/reid-known-serial-numbers.php

 

The information on SNs seems to have been obtained from 'members'. This site has other useful information including how to spot fake Reids.

 

I have a Reid I (RAF marked F5/8886 on the back) with SN P2132 and a Reid IIIa with SN P2370. I only have one Taylor Hobson Anastigmat to share between the two Reids, though. They are beautifully made cameras with a high standard of construction.

 

William

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...