Jump to content

Which M3 - true/false?


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Pardon my feeble recall, but of the very many excellent posts here regarding the M3

it strikes me that the single-stokes were mechanically better. (I also recall

when the M3 was introduced there were cries that a lever advance would tear

the film, and the double-stroke was a good compromise. True? I dunno.)

 

I am looking for an M3 to use with a favorite 50mm Summicron. Is there a

serial number range than one should look for?

 

Thanks to our forum's net wisdom for help.

Best,

Pico

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The M3 was the first Leica camera with film advance lever. It seems like the engineers worried about stress on film advance, so designed it as DS in the first few years of production. Then from snr # 915521 onwards SS was used.

 

There are bodies around with lower serial numbers that were modified from DS to SS. Never heard of models modified in the other direction SS to DS.

 

I prefer SS because it is more natural to me, but other than that DS is fine and even feels smoother to me.

You can maybe find more info here:

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/M3

Edited by dpitt
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Curious that engineers should worry about film tearing when it was designed to go through movie cameras at high speed? To design a double stroke system to avoid tearing must presumably mean they tested a single stroke system as well and found it unreliable? Or is it a story to cover themselves after they realised the smoothness of the double stroke system wasn't on its own justification enough to keep it in the face of competition? But whatever, the rumours are true, the double stroke is marginally smoother but less reliable, however with a well serviced single stroke most people would be hard pressed to detect anything that could be called rough.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes I pull the film transport even at the M3SS into two movements like an M3DS.

Especially in portrait format it is sometimes more convenient if you do not have to spread the film advance lever so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have both: a DS from 1955 and SS from 1960. Both can be fine, and the DS is easy to get used to. If the advance clutch wears on the DS so that it takes more than two strokes to advance (you can feel it slip in this case), the standard fix is to convert to SS, as parts for the DS mechanism are rare.

My 1960 version feels a bit more refined-smoother lens mount, RF patch like the M2 with the DOF notches, etc.

Balsam separation of the VF prism can be an issue on any by now, so look for a good, clear VF.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In his 'Leica Compendium' E Puts writes:-

 

The Leitz engineers were not sure about the effects of the fast operation on the film emulsion and used a glass pressure-plate and a two-stroke wind lever to ease the strain on the film.

 

 

Presumably the glass pressure-plate disappeared along with the double-stroke?

Edited by Keith (M)
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

In his 'Leica Compendium' E Puts writes:-

 

 

 

Presumably the glass pressure-plate disappeared along with the double-stroke?

 

And yet those same engineers had experience of motorised and rapid film advance with specialist models of the Barnack Leica's..................

Edited by 250swb
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...