spydrxx Posted August 12, 2016 Share #21 Posted August 12, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) To each his own. I actually have preferred the 35 Summicron ASPH to the Summilux, although I haven't tried the ASPH FLE. All said and done, almost any of the Leitz 35 lenses produced in the last 50 years have been good; I used a Summaron for over 30 years and really liked the images it produced, although quite different from the more modern Summicrons and Summiluxes. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 12, 2016 Posted August 12, 2016 Hi spydrxx, Take a look here Is the Leica 35mm Summilux-M the quintessential Leica Lens?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
thestatesman Posted August 12, 2016 Author Share #22 Posted August 12, 2016 You sum it up nicely; the Summicron asph is the size winner and my go-anywhere lens. (Except when I take the Elmar-M 50) Actually the Summilux I prefer, for in my eyes it is truly magic, is the 24. Even heavier and bigger than the 35 . Which does not stop me glancing sideways at the Distagon all the time Thank you, I think I need to check out the 24mm Summilux. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jplomley Posted August 12, 2016 Share #23 Posted August 12, 2016 28 Cron Asph at f/2.0; much nicer bokeh than the 28 Lux or 35 Lux, both of which are nervous in comparison at f/1.4. The 28 Cron Asph pairs wonderfully with the 50 Lux Asph, which sports a very similar bokeh. This 28/50 combo is the reason I went Leica. No other manufacturer offers lenses that draw like these two. 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted August 12, 2016 Share #24 Posted August 12, 2016 (edited) My idea as well; I was very impressed by test shots I took. Should I get a fast 35 I would opt for the Zeiss. The size difference is not as decisive as internet lore makes out. I was very surprised to read the comment claiming that it's so widely accepted that the Distagon is better, even by FLE owners. I haven't seen one or noticed any opinions like that . I don't doubt that they can produce great results of course. I do think that personal preferences and priorities will influence our choices. and there is no one definitive correct answer to these questions. I really enjoyed the Summilux M 35 ASPH. My early production one needed calibration from new but the results were afterwards superb. I sacrificed mine to fund something with an S in the name. On physical M lens size, I am sensitive certainly. The Summilux 21, 24 and 28 designs and the Noctilux are all larger than I prefer with an M too. I should qualify my opinion, in that I think that the Summilux is wonderful for travel and street photography. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited August 12, 2016 by hoppyman 14 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/263421-is-the-leica-35mm-summilux-m-the-quintessential-leica-lens/?do=findComment&comment=3095300'>More sharing options...
MarkP Posted August 13, 2016 Share #25 Posted August 13, 2016 I was very surprised to read the comment claiming that it's so widely accepted that the Distagon is better, even by FLE owners. I haven't seen one or noticed any opinions like that . I don't doubt that they can produce great results of course. I do think that personal preferences and priorities will influence our choices. and there is no one definitive correct answer to these questions. I really enjoyed the Summilux M 35 ASPH. My early production one needed calibration from new but the results were afterwards superb. I sacrificed mine to fund something with an S in the name. On physical M lens size, I am sensitive certainly. The Summilux 21, 24 and 28 designs and the Noctilux are all larger than I prefer with an M too. I should qualify my opinion, in that I think that the Summilux is wonderful for travel and street photography. L1033490-Edit-1280-BW.jpg What a fabulous photo Geoff - I wish I'd taken it. It's got it all as well as being technically excellent: the kid still the column to the right and the kid to the left about to start (?), the ubiquitous selfie stick poking up above the crowd in the middle, the observer on the balcony to the top left, and the three men in a row giving you the evil eye in the bottom right of the photo. Can you tell us about it? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cirke Posted August 13, 2016 Share #26 Posted August 13, 2016 (edited) the quintessential Leica M Lens is a Noctilux 43mm APO ASPH and doesn't exists Edited August 13, 2016 by erick 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted August 13, 2016 Share #27 Posted August 13, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) The quintessential Leica lens has to be the 35 summilux (the original). Preferably mounted to a black paint M2 loaded with Tri-X. Nothing is more Leica to me (except I'd opt for an M4) It is good that we can still have the earlier lenses and cameras, but too bad that Tri-X was modified in 2007. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted August 13, 2016 Share #28 Posted August 13, 2016 I was waiting for this question and quite rightly. Please understand I am not, at all, suggesting my photography will leave you gasping But I find, relative to other equipment I own, that is the affect it leaves me to feel by some measure. My photos are personal to me - my family, friends and memories, I am only so happy to find such memories rendered so brilliantly, and permanently for posterity. [...] Do I see a tiny touch of fill-flash there? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neko Posted August 13, 2016 Share #29 Posted August 13, 2016 (edited) I have been shooting today with the 35 FLE and 50 APO. I love the way the 35 FLE renders wide open. At smaller apertures is tack sharp, but the bokeh can be a bit hash in some occasions. I am not a Leica lens expert by any means, but I have been shooting this 35 as my only lens for a year and half and I am really happy with the results so far. About the ¨quintessential qualities ¨ of the lens I´m afraid I´m not knowledgable enough to say anything valuable. Only have owned 4 Leica lenses so far. Edited August 13, 2016 by Neko Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neko Posted August 13, 2016 Share #30 Posted August 13, 2016 (edited) Some times I take advantage of the field curvature of this lens to apply the ¨rule of third¨, getting really nice 3D effects. Edited August 13, 2016 by Neko Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steppenw0lf Posted August 14, 2016 Share #31 Posted August 14, 2016 The quintessential Leica M lens is for me the Summicron-M 35 (V4). It is tiny, unobtrusive and of high quality. Lately, the Elmarit-M 28 Asph was just as typical/quintessential for Leica M, as it is even slightly smaller. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thestatesman Posted August 14, 2016 Author Share #32 Posted August 14, 2016 Do I see a tiny touch of fill-flash there? Just some wonderful autumnal light under the canopy and a lens that does it justice. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted August 14, 2016 Share #33 Posted August 14, 2016 (edited) What a fabulous photo Geoff - I wish I'd taken it. It's got it all as well as being technically excellent: the kid still the column to the right and the kid to the left about to start (?), the ubiquitous selfie stick poking up above the crowd in the middle, the observer on the balcony to the top left, and the three men in a row giving you the evil eye in the bottom right of the photo. Can you tell us about it? oh thanks Mark. I love Barcelona, it's welcoming and wonderful and its home to a great street shooter friend too. This was my 4th visit. . This was a part of a huge festival. The casteleers are a Catalan tradition building human towers. As can be seen the crowd was very dense. The base of the tower is supported by the crowd too. I managed to get my M above my head holding it clear of selfie sticks and used live view to frame after pre estimating focus. There is only a small straightening crop. I made a couple of portraits of the brave child who climbs to the top of the tower and had to lean back to reach the minimum ficus limit too so tht will be a clue on where I was. The guys with the evil eye are probably more strained from the effort and the crush than anything. People are extremely welcoming and public photography very often brings great smiles when you are seen. At tht event there was a very obvious passionate element about Catalan Independence to witness too. Perhaps I can point you to a few photos? Edited August 14, 2016 by hoppyman 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterGA Posted August 18, 2016 Share #34 Posted August 18, 2016 A rangefinder matched to lens which is almost impossible to focus wide open on a moving object is a romantic notion - and a Leica rangefinder is all about romance. Noctilux is the lens for me. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/263421-is-the-leica-35mm-summilux-m-the-quintessential-leica-lens/?do=findComment&comment=3098210'>More sharing options...
Kupo43 Posted August 18, 2016 Share #35 Posted August 18, 2016 Currently have 35 Cron ASPH and love it, although I will say that I am actively trying to upgrade to a 35 Lux. The idea of shooting at 1.4 is just too tempting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.liam Posted August 18, 2016 Share #36 Posted August 18, 2016 Currently have 35 Cron ASPH and love it, although I will say that I am actively trying to upgrade to a 35 Lux. The idea of shooting at 1.4 is just too tempting. You can "side-grade" to a ZM 1,4/35, cost-wise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
richfx Posted August 19, 2016 Share #37 Posted August 19, 2016 I own Leica's 35mm Summilux FLE, which is a great lens, and a Zeiss 35mm Biogon f/2.8. I prefer the Zeiss' IQ, size and compactness unless low light demands the Lux. I just returned from five weeks in Australia and shot the Zeiss almost exclusively. It's that good. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
richfx Posted August 19, 2016 Share #38 Posted August 19, 2016 Zeiss 35 2.8: file:///Users/rcerick/Desktop/L1004249.jpg file:///Users/rcerick/Desktop/L1004264.jpg Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted August 19, 2016 Share #39 Posted August 19, 2016 It does not work to link to your own drive, rcerick. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
richfx Posted August 19, 2016 Share #40 Posted August 19, 2016 It does not work to link to your own drive, rcerick. Can't attach a photo. Seems like a mystery to do so. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.