Jump to content

Which 35


martinimages

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I am shooting with a Leica M3, I have a Summicron 50 f2 and want to go a little wider, what's your advice on the Leica 3,5cm f3.5 Summaron with goggles, is this a good lens choice or am I better trying the Summaron with goggles f2.8 version, how do these to lens compare in optical quality, thanks in advance

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

The goggled versions do help framing with an M3. For mine I have a goggled v1 35 Summicron. The goggles add distortion, reflections, and lower contrast to the viewfinder, but of course don't affect the film image.

The Summicron does give nice images, but I actually prefer the images from my 2.8 Summaron, a non-goggled version for my M2. It seems to have higher contrast than the v1 Summicron.

I also have a 3.5 LTM Summaron from my IIIf. Lately I notice low contrast with it, as it has developed some internal haze. So whatever you find, use a flashlight to check for internal haze, as any of these without haze give nicer images than any with haze.

You could get very good images with any of them. My preference is the 2.8 Summaron.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the goggled summicron- it is an awesome lens if you ask me:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...