Jump to content

MP vs. M-A


Recommended Posts

I was obviously just joking and having fun with your prose.

 

I think Leica thought of "analog" as in a camera that is not digital (b/c analog is typically defined as pre-digital mechanism), hence film...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The M-A is not likely built like the M5, M4 and earlier models which were all hand-fitted.

.

What's the romance with hand fitted parts? I'm glad Leica techs took the time 'back then' to make everything as perfect as it could be but these days CNC machining can turn out even tiny parts with tremendous precision. Just ask Rolex or Omega. Do you think all the great ASPH lenses we enjoy now are being hand ground? People want highly paid German techs in Wetzlar to file their seer but they complain about the price of an M-A. Do the math.

 

We have it good, in part because the assemblers have it good. I'm OK with that. It's a better deal than Apple gives its subs.

 

s-a

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get the hand fitted Romance, either. What did they do, take out the dremmel tools and drill away all day long? Drill the inside of the plate, drill this part, drill that part, shim this, shim that, extra thick grease here, no grease there, longer screw here, glue in there?

 

Kind of silly, imo. And I am a Big M2/3/4/5 fan.

Edited by NB23
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The M-A is not likely built like the M5, M4 and earlier models which were all hand-fitted.

.

Irrelevant, pointless comment unless you insist on believing the earth flat, weaving your own hair shirt, eating weeds and going barefoot. 

 

The M-A is a perfect alternative to a metered M such as the MP.   Great to still have the option.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The M-A is not likely built like the M5, M4 and earlier models which were all hand-fitted.

.

I certainly hope that Leica is using different production techniques today than they were 40 or 50 years ago! Hand-fitting? I thought that ended with the IIIc when they went to die-casting.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, the brighter viewfinder of the M-A is key, plus the focusing mechanism is supposedly improved (borrowing from digital M advances), and it is new inside.

 

 

Brighter viewfinder? As compared to the MP? Is this true? I didn't know that. Do you mean less cluttered? or indeed brighter? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...