Jump to content

Dark frame noise reducing


towander4343

Recommended Posts

no ......and if you fancy a 1hr exposure using the remote cord you will have a 1hr NR exposure wait as well. I know, I've tried .... and given up ....

 

Leica's standard excuse in the past has been 'to preserve image quality' 

 

which is fair enough ..... if you haven't by that stage beaten the camera to bits in frustration at the tedium of waiting, waiting, waiting .....

 

that degree of 'image quality preservation' equates to 'not bothering to take the picture at all' as far as I'm concerned, so it hasn't achieved very much ..... :(

Edited by thighslapper
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The dark frame noise reduction cannot be matched by post-processing. It is an illusion to think that switching it off and using Dfine or such could match the result. In fact, without the dark frame (one could see it momentarily on the M8) the image looks awful.

I am sure that those clamoring for an override would use it - once  and never again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ......and if you fancy a 1hr exposure using the remote cord you will have a 1hr NR exposure wait as well. I know, I've tried .... and given up ....

 

Leica's standard excuse in the past has been 'to preserve image quality' 

 

which is fair enough ..... if you haven't by that stage beaten the camera to bits in frustration at the tedium of waiting, waiting, waiting .....

 

that degree of 'image quality preservation' equates to 'not bothering to take the picture at all' as far as I'm concerned, so it hasn't achieved very much ..... :(

If you don't take any photos you cannot make any bad ones.  You can also save thousands of dollars that way.  :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The dark frame noise reduction cannot be matched by post-processing. It is an illusion to think that switching it off and using Dfine or such could match the result. In fact, without the dark frame (one could see it momentarily on the M8) the image looks awful.

I am sure that those clamoring for an override would use it - once  and never again.

 

 

No, but I'd love to be able to build a master dark frame for the same temperature at the end of the evening, for example, rather than having to take separate darks after each exposure.  I do this all the time with my astronomy cameras and get much better results than I ever could with a single dark.  Of course, astronomy cameras are generally temperature regulated, but I'd still like to be able to turn the feature off so I could capture star trails and the like.  

 

- Jared

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

No, but I'd love to be able to build a master dark frame for the same temperature at the end of the evening, for example, rather than having to take separate darks after each exposure.  I do this all the time with my astronomy cameras and get much better results than I ever could with a single dark.  Of course, astronomy cameras are generally temperature regulated, but I'd still like to be able to turn the feature off so I could capture star trails and the like.  

 

- Jared

 

Agreed completely. Leica needs to give the users a choice on long exposure noise reduction. Every other full frame camera I have used (Canon, Sony, Nikon, etc) gives you the option to disable LENR. I suspect the SL would perform about the same as other recent full frame cameras, all of which are completely usable without LENR.

 

And yes, you can definitely improve on forced sequential LENR performance by building a master dark frame with 4-5 exposures at the end of the shoot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the very wording "In camera Noise Reduction" is misleading, as has been pointed out the dark frame is only taking away hot pixels. Perhaps it should be called something like DFS for 'dark frame subtraction'. Anyway the point is we should be able to turn it off and not be forced to have it on each and every image. Incidentally I wrote to Leica UK about this issue and whilst they acknowledged my email about a week ago they have yet to reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, I suspect you are right. Too bad. In an effort to improve image quality in long exposures Leica is actually damaging our ability to better address hot pixels through a master dark (average of several dark frames taken at the end of the imaging run then applied to all light frames). The result is increased noise vs. what we could do if we could just shut off mandatory dark frame subtraction.

 

- Jared

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

At least you can do a long exposure... (us M240 owners can't  :blink: )

 

 

Or S.... not even the 007. This and LENR are the number one reasons I don't shoot Leica exclusively.

 

Shouldn't it be up to me whether I shoot for the ultimate IQ or accept some reduction in IQ for increased functionality?

 

I've done 8 mins without LENR on my Pentax and the results were great. I have 24" prints. I've done 22 mins with a separate dark frame added in post and the results were great. But my Leicas with their stunning optics stay at home because they are functionally hobbled.

 

Gordon

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting arguments!

 

I opened this in another thread ---> http://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/265418-long-exposures/

 

I appreciate that L are only wanting to see the goody-goody side of their camera by building in corseting restrictions, the ones which some engineer thinks are 'best'.

 

But, we customers have a right to 'see the dark side' and judge ourselves what we like.

 

I frequently take pictures (D700 / D800) in extreme environments, some long exposures (>100 min). The LE pics from the very cold environments are fine (for me!) without LENR; the ones from hot environments are borderline, and benefit from the LENR dark frame... PITA wait!

 

The real answer is to open the camera firmware interface to public use; my filius is into this with Canon cameras. The solution is a simple BASIC or PYTHON interpreter that, for example, allows..

  • take pic_1 (parameters provided either automatically, or by operator)
  • take pic_2 (parameters provided either automatically, or by operator)
  • take pic_3 (parameters provided either automatically, or by operator)
  • BEEP 3 times (the camera can now be dismounted -- display message on screen)
  • take LENR_frame
  • subtract LENR_frame from pic_1 to produce refined pic_1
  • subtract LENR_frame from pic_2 to produce refined pic_2
  • subtract LENR_frame from pic_3 to produce refined pic_3
  • BEEP 10 times (the camera can now be switched off / used again)

BTW... using scripts enables exposure time >> than the 30s offered by the camera FW.

 

Another interesting use case is taking a number of dark frames and subtracting them; one can learn a lot about the sensor quality (over time)   ;-))

 

Yes... I know some of the above can be achieved in PP, but I would prefer to use the camera's own facilities to reduce platform complexity / sources of error.

 

Anyways... there is always the new Hasselblad!

 

-g-

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...