Jump to content

Leica gent dismisses idea of new Monochrom


VictoriaC

Recommended Posts

Victoria, that has to be one of the silliest things I've heard out of a salesman, since a moron at Vistek in Toronto opined to me how 'a digital rangefinder was impossible as a matter of physics' about 30 days before the M8 was announced. Chalk it up to a real life version of the dpreview forum ;)

 

All sensors are, by definition 'black and white', or rather luminance-measuring devices only. The Bayer matrix is an add-on. There is no reason why a CMOS device, sans bayer, cannot produce a native black and white image just as well as a CCD can. The fact that stunning B&W conversions are QED from the best CMOS 'colour' sensors is proof enough of that fact.

 

A more obvious indicator, however, is the significant rebate on the MM which has been in place for most of 2015. That is the clearest sign that a new model is coming.

 

Perhaps we will all be proven wrong, but a new MM is likely in 2015. Just wish I could afford it!

 

Cheers,

 

- N.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Victoria, that has to be one of the silliest things I've heard out of a salesman, since a moron at Vistek in Toronto opined to me how 'a digital rangefinder was impossible as a matter of physics'.

 

It was the official Leica party line (certainly prior to the release of the RD-1). I'm pretty sure there were people in this forum saying the same kind of thing (maybe Jaap?).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

....... and everyone has overlooked the obvious point that the current MM can't use anything except native Leica lenses which are RF coupled ..... whereas a CMOS version could use liveview and an electronic VF as in the M .....

 

the one thing the MM excels at is producing great images from legacy lenses .... and expanding this facility would create a much larger user base....

 

Leica would be stupid not to update the MM with a CMOS based sensor ..... and past experience suggests that if one is going to appear it should be sometime soon ......

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi all,

No, he wasn't the manager (pretty sure of that) but I'd never heard the comment that the CMOS sensor doesn't lend itself to black and white conversion as well as the CCD sensor does! I did reply to him that at the very least an MM update would be beneficial just to make the back screen out of gorilla glass and fix the sensor issue and ensure the weather proofing is as good as it can be.

I carry my 240 all the time (it had approx 750 photos when I bought it last year and now I'm up to over 4000). I'm still using the M7 (the M6 has become a back up to the M7 since I got the 240) as I have use of the darkroom for black and white at art school where I'm studying, and I still fantasise about the MM… but I'm waiting.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did reply to him that at the very least an MM update would be beneficial just to make the back screen out of gorilla glass and fix the sensor issue and ensure the weather proofing is as good as it can be.

 

Really? I wouldn't have wasted any more of my breath or time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did reply to him that at the very least an MM update would be beneficial just to make the back screen out of gorilla glass and fix the sensor issue and ensure the weather proofing is as good as it can be.

 

Plus other M benefits...improved RF, quiet shutter re-cock, smoother shutter release, longer battery life, faster processor, 2m illuminated frame lines, stronger tripod socket….besides the better weather proofing and enhanced reliability. In short, a better built RF camera, irrespective of any possible LV (and EVF option) or video, both of which can be quickly disabled on the M if desired.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

The MM is a wonderous camera, but it is a potent reminder how sucky everything except image quality was on the M9. The write-speed is beyond pathetic. The screen might as well not be there, and the light meter would make a Nikon F blush.

 

So yes, an update to the modern electronics would be nice indeed. But man....the files!

 

That said, I was surprised at how grainy/noisy the higher ISO files are on the MM. Having spent the previous nine months looking at nothing but images from a 645z, I realized just how far my benchmarks had moved. ISO 6400 files from the MM can be processed to look very decent, but present day CMOS technology is probably four full stops better. That said, I am not sure I really need clean ISO 12500 that often :-)

 

- N.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

ISO 6400 files from the MM can be processed to look very decent, but present day CMOS technology is probably four full stops better.

 

 

Four full stops? Really? So a very decent ISO 100,000 compared to the 6,400? Alright then, let's make sure we bring a flashlight so we can see the road when we go out taking pictures.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Four full stops? Really? So a very decent ISO 100,000 compared to the 6,400? Alright then, let's make sure we bring a flashlight so we can see the road when we go out taking pictures.

 

A monochrome only version of the Sony A7s would be mind blowing enough ...

then add image stabilization like in the A7-II.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A new iteration of the Monochrom would be nice, and I look forward to seeing it introduced. However I'm afraid there is no way I'll be able to afford the new model. That means mine will have to last for awhile longer.

 

With digital there always seems to be a "better" version just around the corner. Fortunately the one I already own is already shockingly good. In fact, it is so much more capable than I that I need to spend much, much more time learning to use this one.

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

A monochrome only version of the Sony A7s would be mind blowing enough ...

then add image stabilization like in the A7-II.

I don't know about Sony. A premier sensor producer, they seem to lack a sense of direction in camera design. They throw a camera at the wall every few months to see which one will stick, as opposed to Fuji, who appear to have a clear-cut design philosophy of marrying traditional camera values to bleeding edge technology at affordable prices.

Not that some Sonys aren't interesting cameras, though.

Edited by jaapv
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...