sblitz Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23301 Posted October 28, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Looks like my sort of place Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk Next time I am in England I will ask for the address! :-) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 Hi sblitz, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
MT0227 Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23302 Posted October 28, 2016 How do you handle the overlapping exposure of 4 exposures, without over exposing? Thanks a lot, Gary, Marc, Xenia and Eoin. Here is another but this time FOUR exposures on one negative, each taken at a different rotation. Tri-X (Orange filter) SWC azrieli 4.jpg Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23303 Posted October 28, 2016 Exciting shot, Steve. How does the cost of that B&W film compare to Tri-X? Nice one, Charles. Eastman XX is 5.99 for a roll of 24 exposures (guys at the film photography project won't spool 36 for some reason). The CineStill crowd produces this once a year, for some reason they don't make it a regular product. Shot at its native 200 I find it has really good blacks but it is also not a high contrast film, lot more grays than Tri-X -- I like clean, lots of grays. Adox CHS II 100 iso is similar except that it makes orthochromatic so reds come out darker. Tri-X, according to B&H web site is $4.95 for a roll of 36. Ready for our annual dawn water shoot? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MT0227 Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23304 Posted October 28, 2016 SWC/M + Voigtlander Low Angle Finder TMAX400 D76 1:1 @20C Nikon LS-9000 - One more from the Veteran's memorial near my home. 2016-09-25-0002 by Marc Tauber, on Flickr 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23305 Posted October 28, 2016 Next time I am in England I will ask for the address! :-) I would take you to some fantastic real ale pubs 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23306 Posted October 28, 2016 I have already shown you some B+W shots of this shoot, here's a Kodak 200 (out of date) M4P 35mm color skopar 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23307 Posted October 28, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Some Autumn colour same film as above M4P 28mm Ultron 13 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23308 Posted October 28, 2016 One for Henry, same film and camera as above 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23309 Posted October 28, 2016 Works brilliantly Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk This is even better Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk Thanks, Gary Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23310 Posted October 28, 2016 How do you handle the overlapping exposure of 4 exposures, without over exposing? Hmm...hmmm...I used Tri-X?? Really, I have no idea. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23311 Posted October 28, 2016 Eastman XX is 5.99 for a roll of 24 exposures (guys at the film photography project won't spool 36 for some reason). The CineStill crowd produces this once a year, for some reason they don't make it a regular product. Shot at its native 200 I find it has really good blacks but it is also not a high contrast film, lot more grays than Tri-X -- I like clean, lots of grays. Adox CHS II 100 iso is similar except that it makes orthochromatic so reds come out darker. Tri-X, according to B&H web site is $4.95 for a roll of 36. Ready for our annual dawn water shoot? Interesting., thanks. I was born ready for a dawn shoot. And the señorita from the Challah asked me this morning where her photo was.... I blushed, clutched my bag full of challah, and then mumbled something about how you need to give it to her.... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23312 Posted October 28, 2016 I have already shown you some B+W shots of this shoot, here's a Kodak 200 (out of date) M4P 35mm color skopar Some Autumn colour same film as above M4P 28mm Ultron These are fantastic, Gary. Although I like the first I do prefer the B&W of this lovely lady. Both renditions are lovely, though. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23313 Posted October 28, 2016 Hmm...hmmm...I used Tri-X?? Really, I have no idea. I was told to underexpose and raise the exposure for each shot 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23314 Posted October 28, 2016 I was told to underexpose and raise the exposure for each shot Yes, that is how i intuited it as well. But then i got myself confused as to how much incremental underexp i need and blah blah and then i said f... it i am using tri-x 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23315 Posted October 28, 2016 (edited) This was the shot before the one above, i was walking backwards as they were coming at me, i know a lot of photographer have gone "arse over tit" doing this (English saying) Edited October 28, 2016 by gsgary 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MT0227 Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23316 Posted October 28, 2016 So no stopping down from your metered levels? Hmm...hmmm...I used Tri-X?? Really, I have no idea. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23317 Posted October 28, 2016 So no stopping down from your metered levels?Nada, umbre 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MT0227 Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23318 Posted October 28, 2016 That's what I was thinking? I was told to underexpose and raise the exposure for each shot Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonnyboy Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23319 Posted October 28, 2016 Xenia absolutely magnifique I like much this framing If you make a book I'll take it ! and you're right for fog in color ..... and in b&w too (see the post above) Kodak Portra 160 Leica M7-35 Lux Asph Our foggy country .... Image7courvkod16lfht++++1000.jpg Regards Henry Stunning capture!! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sellitto Posted October 28, 2016 Share #23320 Posted October 28, 2016 Eastman XX is 5.99 for a roll of 24 exposures (guys at the film photography project won't spool 36 for some reason). The CineStill crowd produces this once a year, for some reason they don't make it a regular product. Shot at its native 200 I find it has really good blacks but it is also not a high contrast film, lot more grays than Tri-X -- I like clean, lots of grays. Adox CHS II 100 iso is similar except that it makes orthochromatic so reds come out darker. Tri-X, according to B&H web site is $4.95 for a roll of 36. Ready for our annual dawn water shoot? Steve,I agree with Adam. I dig the shot. I do believe hp5 or Tri-x may serve you better for the greater latitude they offer. Frank 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.