nelly Posted July 14, 2012 Share #1 Posted July 14, 2012 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) I have been thinking about buying this lens for a while and would appreciate any opinions from owners and past users of this lens who have used it with the M9 and also a film body M I have read various reviews but always find owners and user comments the best. Two concerns I had picked up from the reviews out there were some back focusing issues with some copies and a stiff focusing ring. I do wish it had a similar removable metal compact hood like the 35mm Summilux FLE. How do you like the built in telescoping hood and how many out there have damaged it and had to send in for repair. Is it covered under warranty? I had thought about trying to pick one up second hand but as Leica warranties are not transferrable and if other owners found a need to send their lenses in for adjustment/calibration then maybe I should buy new. Thanks for your input. Neale Edited July 14, 2012 by nelly001 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 14, 2012 Posted July 14, 2012 Hi nelly, Take a look here Thinking of buying a 50mm Summilux ASPH. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
wilfredo Posted July 14, 2012 Share #2 Posted July 14, 2012 (edited) I haven't had any issues with mine (knock on wood). It works as it should. The built in hood is OK, obviously not the best option. It is a bit stiff, but that's no big deal. In terms of performance, it is super sharp @f/1.4. Some don't like it for portraits because it will reveal all flaws on a persons face. Not a good lens when photographing ladies who want to look good in pictures, unless they have flawless skin. Here is a portrait shot. Skin looks great but this is an 18 year old. :-) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited July 14, 2012 by wilfredo 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/183662-thinking-of-buying-a-50mm-summilux-asph/?do=findComment&comment=2062588'>More sharing options...
01af Posted July 14, 2012 Share #3 Posted July 14, 2012 (edited) I have been thinking about buying this lens for a while and would appreciate any opinions from owners ... Great lens. Absolutely great lens. If you're looking for the ultimate 35-mm-format standard lens then this is it ... umm, or possibly the upcoming Apo-Summicron-M 50 mm Asph which is even greater (really—I tried it) but it's slower and will cost 2.5× as much. Two concerns I had picked up from the reviews out there were some back focusing issues with some copies ... This is just an adjustment issue which can happen with any lens. I do wish it had a similar removable metal compact hood like the 35mm Summilux FLE. How do you like the built-in telescoping hood ...? I absolutely detest the built-in hood! It's ridiculously short and hardly useful. Thank goodness there are cheap screw-in hoods in E46 size 'for Leica' from China-based online dealers which work admirably on the Summilux-M 50 Asph. I use one of these and they are just fine. Edited July 14, 2012 by 01af 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted July 14, 2012 Share #4 Posted July 14, 2012 Neale, my lens is not stiff to focus, but smooth and precise. The lens hood is a compromise with convenience winning. It does collapse in use unless locked as suggested. I have not use it on film, but digital is more demanding from a focus point of view. Focus has been perfect on mine. It is noticeably heavier than my 50 Summicron, but out-performs it at the wider apertures. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelly Posted July 14, 2012 Author Share #5 Posted July 14, 2012 I haven't had any issues with mine (knock on wood). It works as it should. The built in hood is OK, obviously not the best option. It is a bit stiff, but that's no big deal. In terms of performance, it is super sharp @f/1.4. Some don't like it for portraits because it will reveal all flaws on a persons face. Not a good lens when photographing ladies who want to look good in pictures, unless they have flawless skin. Here is a portrait shot. Skin looks great but this is an 18 year old. :-) I have been shooting portraits with my 50mm Nokton 1.1 and I know this lens has received some comments about being soft wide open but has produced some flattering portraits and especially liked by the women I have photographed. I do like the idea of a sharp 50 wide open for more gritty portraits though Thanks for your take on it Wilfredo Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnbuckley Posted July 14, 2012 Share #6 Posted July 14, 2012 (edited) A glorious lens. Not stiff to focus. Never had any back focusing issue. I don't really use the hood much, but it is smooth and easy to twist into position. Both a very sharp lens, and a lens whose bokeh is, I believe, distinctive and superb. It is a great partner to the M9! Edited July 14, 2012 by johnbuckley Bokeh was auto spelled as broken :-) 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpalme Posted July 15, 2012 Share #7 Posted July 15, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) Well known as the best 50. But that's an opinion of course. I love it's rendering so I am a big fan. As far as new or used they are not as hard to find new as they were last year. So I would call around the dealers. I used Popflash and I think it was seven months. I love pull out hoods. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelly Posted July 15, 2012 Author Share #8 Posted July 15, 2012 Well known as the best 50. But that's an opinion of course. I love it's rendering so I am a big fan. As far as new or used they are not as hard to find new as they were last year. So I would call around the dealers. I used Popflash and I think it was seven months. I love pull out hoods. I have a new one on hold for me and must make the decision on monday Because I already had the 50mm Nokton 1.1 I have been trying to decide if I need both. I know they are very different lenses and obviously the summilux is in a league of its own. Thanks for your thoughts on it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michali Posted July 15, 2012 Share #9 Posted July 15, 2012 Speaking from my own personal experience with these lenses, I purchased a 50mm Summilux ASPH about 3 years ago and it's on my camera 90% of the time. I also had a Nokton f1.1 but found it too soft wide open and too bulky so I sold it. A few months ago I bought a Noctilux 0.95 and after 6 weeks I sold that as well. I found the wide open rendering IMO too "contrived", the CA when shooting into the light drove me nuts and it's also far too bulky for an M lens. If for whatever reason I had to give up all my lenses and keep only one, it would be the 50 Summilux ASPH. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilfredo Posted July 15, 2012 Share #10 Posted July 15, 2012 The Nokton doesn't come close to what the Summilux ASPH can produce wide open. I purchased a Nokton only to return it, and finally decided on the Lux. The Lux is regarded by many as the finest Leica lens ever made. It's not cheap but I've never regretted the purchase. If you need a fast sharp lens, this is as good as it gets. Good luck with your choice. Bottom line question: Will it meet your needs? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted July 15, 2012 Share #11 Posted July 15, 2012 I wouldn't compare the Nokton with the Summilux - two very different lenses and different renderings. The Summilux is arguably one of the best 50mm lenses ever made. The Nokton is an excellent performer at a comparatively moderate price point and can be flattering for portraits. I have both and both get some usage (but then, so do a bunch of old rangefinder lenses, so perhaps I'm not representative of the never-ending quest for super-sharp glass...) If funds allow, I'd have both. If I had to keep only one, it would be the Lux. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted July 15, 2012 Share #12 Posted July 15, 2012 The 50 Summilux ASPH is a stellar performer wide on, which after all is why most users buy it. it has all the sharpness you would ever want, and to the argument that 'sharpness isn't everything': I agree but it's easy to reduce sharpness when required but not the other way around. Yes, the telescopic lens hood is pretty ineffectual but the lens is so flare resistant, especially to veiling glare, that I hardly ever use it anyway. I've experienced no back focus problems with mine on my M2, MP, M8, or M9-P. The focus ring was slightly heavy when it was new but it's not something that bothers me now; either it's run itself in or its trained me. Pete. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlorianM Posted July 15, 2012 Share #13 Posted July 15, 2012 (edited) I'd say the combination of sharp in focus plane and creamy smooth bokeh is unique. This lens is probably the #1 reason why I want to upgrade to a FF Leica. No issues with mine whatsoever. I did buy it new though, if possible try before you buy. I forgot: the focus ring is noticeably stiffer than all other M mount lenses I own or tried. It's not a deal breaker and the tab helps, but combined with shallow dof wide open and it clearly requires the most care and effort to focus. Only an issue for moving subjects though. Edited July 15, 2012 by FlorianM Added info 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted July 15, 2012 Share #14 Posted July 15, 2012 One thing, if you should want to use a filter on it, buy a black one; a chrome filter mount will flare in the short hood. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Posted July 15, 2012 Share #15 Posted July 15, 2012 It's the best lens for the money in the world, including the 50 APO. Buy it and never look back. Focus is silky smooth on my black lens. The hood is flimsy but largely irrelevant since the lens virtually never flares. /S 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
insomnia Posted July 15, 2012 Share #16 Posted July 15, 2012 Had this lens for the last year as my only one - it's an exceptional allrounder and performer. Would definitely go for it if 50mm is your FL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LotharZhou Posted July 15, 2012 Share #17 Posted July 15, 2012 The best 50mm I ever used, bokeh and in focus area are equally pleasing. I only wish I had a black one as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramosa Posted July 15, 2012 Share #18 Posted July 15, 2012 it's a great lens. but (and this may be a sin) i sold it because the rendering was too perfect for me, too "karbeian." i'm more of a watz/late mandler guy. but if you like the modern rendering, the lux 50 asph will make you very happy. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AB007 Posted July 16, 2012 Share #19 Posted July 16, 2012 Just buy it......most people will agree that it is the best 50/1.4 if not the best 50. It is my fav 50. I would love to have another one...... in silver Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted July 16, 2012 Share #20 Posted July 16, 2012 +1+1+1+1+1+1+1 nothing more to add -- just get the lens and start shooting, you will be glad that you did... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.