Jump to content

The Leica Forum uses cookies. Read the privacy statement for more info. To remove this message, please click the button to the right:    OK, understood.

Photo
- - - - -

Super-Elmar Demo


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#1 lars_bergquist

lars_bergquist

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 5,467 posts
  • City / Ort:Greater Stockholm

Posted 10 February 2012 - 18:25

Advertisement (Gone after free registration)
There have been some doubts about the Super-Elmar-M 1:3.4/21mm ASPH (to give it its full solemn name). The winter has not been very inducive to outdoor photography, to be sure. Today however we had some decent though cold weather here in Stockholm, so I took the lens and my M9 out for a walk.

This is just one picture: Full frame, and then cropped. F:8, focus on the statue, and the sun is just behind it.

I used that lens in the subway, along the icy waters and inside the Museum of Modern Art, where I enjoyed an exhibition of the photo collection. Where else can you see within a few minutes Robert Capa's D-Day landing picture, Ansel Adams' Moon and Half-dome, August Sander's fat pastry cook and Julia Margaret Cameron's Mountain Nymph, all in original prints? Not in too many places. But it all boils down to a confirmation of what I knew already: This is one hell of a lens. Period.

The old man from the Age of the Contax 21mm Biogon
.

Attached Files


Edited by lars_bergquist, 10 February 2012 - 18:33.

  • pgk, MA-Sweden, Paulus and 6 others said thank you

#2 kokoshawnuff

kokoshawnuff

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 910 posts
  • City / Ort:Los Angeles

Posted 10 February 2012 - 18:38

Every time I hear doubts about a modern Leica lens, I don't really understand it. At their 'worst', I'd still rather have Leica glass and design than any other...

If you cropped your photo to 800% you could probably come close to making out beaks and eyes on the ducks between yourself and the boat.
  • algrove said thank you to this

#3 Double Negative

Double Negative

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Validating
  • 1,717 posts
  • City / Ort:New York

Posted 10 February 2012 - 20:09

^ Agreed, K!

Doubts? Nope. :)

#4 bpalme

bpalme

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 711 posts
  • City / Ort:Dallas , TX

Posted 11 February 2012 - 03:45

That's amazing.

#5 darylgo

darylgo

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 537 posts

Posted 11 February 2012 - 05:38

I lost my doubts when my tests showed the 75mm Summarit outresolved my Summicron and the 24mm Elmar f3.8 Elmar M is just about perfect in every way.

#6 lars_bergquist

lars_bergquist

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 5,467 posts
  • City / Ort:Greater Stockholm

Posted 11 February 2012 - 08:55

All right, more of the same.

A 1:3.4 21mm lens can be an indoor lens too; the old Super-Angulon too was one, even with the slow films of that generation (remember Tri-X rated at ASA 200?) This one is from the subway.

The super-angular old man
.

Attached Files


  • kokoshawnuff said thank you to this

#7 MarkP

MarkP

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Premium Member
  • 5,081 posts
  • City / Ort:Sydney

Posted 11 February 2012 - 14:18

Lars,

if I may join your 3.4/21 SEM ASPH love-fest with a few test photos shot this evening, mainly into the sun (and hopefully ,not get in trouble from the moderators for posting photos here)....

"Today however we had some decent though warm weather here in Sydney, so I also took the lens and my M9 out for a walk..."
first time I've used the SEM...

Lovely rendering (reminds me of my 2.0/28 Summicron ASPH), and very flare resistant whilst holding contrast well (although I did manage to force it to flare a little with the sun coming into the side in #5)

Very reassuring to know this lens works well in warm and cold weather, and even upside down in the Antipodes:rolleyes:
"This is indeed one hell of a lens. Period."

the younger man from the warmer climate


Rose Bay, Sydney Harbour
M9, 3.4/21 Super-Elmar-M ASPH

Attached File  Rose Bay 2.jpg   353.75KB   904 downloads


Attached File  Rose Bay 3.jpg   365.81KB   900 downloads


Attached File  Rose Bay 1.jpg   468.98KB   898 downloads


Attached File  Rose Bay 4.jpg   494.02KB   889 downloads


Attached File  Rose Bay 5.jpg   529.49KB   891 downloads

Edited by MarkP, 11 February 2012 - 14:25.

  • hoppyman and JazzDoc said thank you to this

#8 hoppyman

hoppyman

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 3,234 posts
  • City / Ort:Brisbane, Australia

Posted 11 February 2012 - 22:59

Those are well made photographs, Mark You've taken care to use your foregrounds well too. Fine examples.
  • MarkP said thank you to this
"Leica Das Wesentliche"


Cheers,
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman

#9 Prosophos

Prosophos

    Photographer.

  • Members
  • 928 posts

Posted 12 February 2012 - 02:24

Thanks for posting these images everybody. I've been intrigued by this lens - definitely looks like a nice choice. I keep thinking I should give it a try, but it's not a focal length I use often.

In addition, I own one of the alternatives: the Zeiss ZM 21/2.8.

This is one of my favourites, and I own plenty of Leica glass. Feels somehow "hollow" (i.e., not as substantial) in the hand relative to the Leica-built lenses, but I can't argue with the results.

If you're not a believer, have a look at some of the images I've taken with it:

Zeiss ZM 21mm f/2.8

Regards,

Peter.
P r o s o p h o s
  • ravinj, MarkP, rramesh and 1 other said thank you

Peter | Prosophos | PhotographsbyPeter.com


#10 MarkP

MarkP

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Premium Member
  • 5,081 posts
  • City / Ort:Sydney

Posted 12 February 2012 - 04:07

Thanks for posting these images everybody. I've been intrigued by this lens - definitely looks like a nice choice. I keep thinking I should give it a try, but it's not a focal length I use often.

In addition, I own one of the alternatives: the Zeiss ZM 21/2.8.

This is one of my favourites, and I own plenty of Leica glass. Feels somehow "hollow" (i.e., not as substantial) in the hand relative to the Leica-built lenses, but I can't argue with the results.

If you're not a believer, have a look at some of the images I've taken with it:

Zeiss ZM 21mm f/2.8

Regards,

Peter.
P r o s o p h o s



Peter,

nice 21 Biogon photos.
I'm a ZM believer, see my recent 4.5/21 Biogon photos:

http://www.l-camera-...-australia.html
http://www.l-camera-...-australia.html

I'm in the same situation as you: lots of Leica glass but I'm keeping my 1.5/50 Sonnar and 2.8/25 Biogon. With somewhat mixed feelings I'm selling the 4.5/21 Biogon to offset the 3.4/21 SEM purchase (and as I also have a 21 Summilux more than two 21s is way over the top).

Mark

Edited by MarkP, 12 February 2012 - 04:10.


#11 Prosophos

Prosophos

    Photographer.

  • Members
  • 928 posts

Posted 12 February 2012 - 05:09

Peter,

nice 21 Biogon photos.
I'm a ZM believer, see my recent 4.5/21 Biogon photos:

http://www.l-camera-...-australia.html
http://www.l-camera-...-australia.html

I'm in the same situation as you: lots of Leica glass but I'm keeping my 1.5/50 Sonnar and 2.8/25 Biogon. With somewhat mixed feelings I'm selling the 4.5/21 Biogon to offset the 3.4/21 SEM purchase (and as I also have a 21 Summilux more than two 21s is way over the top).

Mark


Hi Mark, thanks.

Looking at your 4.5/21 images, I must say they are lovely. I think you may regret parting with it... maybe you should reconsider... sorry to add to your over-the-top-angst ;)

Peter.
  • MarkP said thank you to this

Peter | Prosophos | PhotographsbyPeter.com


#12 MarkP

MarkP

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Premium Member
  • 5,081 posts
  • City / Ort:Sydney

Posted 12 February 2012 - 07:40

I think you may regret parting with it... maybe you should reconsider... sorry to add to your over-the-top-angst ;)

Peter.



:confused: :(

Edited by MarkP, 12 February 2012 - 08:05.


#13 lars_bergquist

lars_bergquist

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 5,467 posts
  • City / Ort:Greater Stockholm

Posted 12 February 2012 - 08:31

One common theme here seems to be how well the lens handles subjects of extreme contrast without flare or internal reflections. As I never tire of pointing out, this is very important to RF photographers, as we do not see the damage done until it's too late. Chimp? Well, then the subject may be gone. Not in the pictures published here, but often enough.

The old man from the Age of the 21mm Contax Biogon
  • MarkP said thank you to this

#14 Prosophos

Prosophos

    Photographer.

  • Members
  • 928 posts

Posted 12 February 2012 - 13:09

:confused: :(


Sorry for the awkward wording.

I meant to say that you may regret selling it, even if you have a plethora of 21mm lenses available. From what I see, and your example images certainly verify, is that it's an excellent performing lens... also, its small size is a nice bonus.

Peter.

Peter | Prosophos | PhotographsbyPeter.com


#15 MarkP

MarkP

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Premium Member
  • 5,081 posts
  • City / Ort:Sydney

Posted 12 February 2012 - 20:38

Hi Peter,

I knew exactly what you meant and agree. The symbols weren't having a go at you, but implying my frustration that you may be right and I'm having to reconsider my decision about 4.5/21 C- Biogon. Bad communication on my part.

Regards,
Mark

#16 philipus

philipus

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 2,529 posts
  • City / Ort:'(,,,,)°l°

Posted 13 February 2012 - 00:45

the Super-Elmar-M 1:3.4/21mm ASPH.


Why does this lens have such a small largest aperture?

#17 StephenPatterson

StephenPatterson

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 2,488 posts
  • City / Ort:Wuhan, China

Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:19

Why does this lens have such a small largest aperture?


Because otherwise it would be considerably larger and heavier, cost twice as much, and use the name Summilux. Oh wait, that lens already exists!!!

The 21/3.4 Super Elmar-M is a fantastic combination of size, price and speed in a lens that has very little distortion, is not prone to flare, and is as sharp in the corners wide open as stopped down. In short, it's a winner!!!

Nothing wrong with the 21 Summilux ASPH, but that's a different animal entirely.
  • philipus said thank you to this
Stephen

www.500px.com/Seafurydriver

#18 lars_bergquist

lars_bergquist

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 5,467 posts
  • City / Ort:Greater Stockholm

Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:34

I agree that it is too easy to sit in your armchair fantasizing about lens specifications in abstracto. But we live in a real world, and there's somthing like practicality. Some of it is expressed in the price dimension, but not all. A 21mm Summilux, or a 50mm Noctilux, would not be practical lenses to me, even if I could have them for free. To me, the core of the Leica ethos is that it is a small, handy and flexible camera to capture life as it happens around us. That was what behind the Leica success story in the past century, and that ethos is not obsolete now.

L.B.
  • jpattison and pgk said thank you to this

#19 philipus

philipus

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 2,529 posts
  • City / Ort:'(,,,,)°l°

Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:43

I agree that it is too easy to sit in your armchair fantasizing about lens specifications in abstracto. But we live in a real world, and there's somthing like practicality. Some of it is expressed in the price dimension, but not all. A 21mm Summilux, or a 50mm Noctilux, would not be practical lenses to me, even if I could have them for free. To me, the core of the Leica ethos is that it is a small, handy and flexible camera to capture life as it happens around us. That was what behind the Leica success story in the past century, and that ethos is not obsolete now.

L.B.


Well I wasn't so much fantasizing as being curious. I know next to nothing about lens design but I guess there's got to be some sort of construction/design-related reason for the 21mm being f3.4 and the 24 and 28 Elmarits being 2.8 and so much smaller than the 21mm.

I certainly agree with the last part, the practicality aspect. I've got pretty strong shoulders and back but they still thank me every day I use my Leica stuff rather than an unesthetically large SLR.

#20 StephenPatterson

StephenPatterson

    Erfahrener Benutzer

  • Members
  • 2,488 posts
  • City / Ort:Wuhan, China

Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:25

This lens is just a winner. Here's an image from today, first full frame and then cropped to show detail. B&W conversion in Silver Efex Pro 2.

Attached File  LUF_Seafurydriver_21SEM_LaifengTemple.jpg   422.36KB   663 downloads

Attached File  LUF_Seafurydriver_21SEM_LaifengTempleCrop.jpg   377.24KB   656 downloads
  • Rick and rramesh said thank you to this
Stephen

www.500px.com/Seafurydriver




0 user(s) are reading this topic