Xtophe Posted May 28, 2011 Share #41 Posted May 28, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Here is what I would do. Buy the 1.4 for all the time, and the nokton 1.1 when you want low light. The nokton does a good job and is at 1000 usd. If after a while you really think you need more thannthebnokton, then go for the nocti. But 12000 usd without beingbsure is quite some money. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 28, 2011 Posted May 28, 2011 Hi Xtophe, Take a look here Pros and cons of the Noctilux 0.95 and 50mm Summilux 1.4. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
small-luxury-world Posted May 28, 2011 Share #42 Posted May 28, 2011 Thank you all for making me feel very welcome. It's a bit of a refreshing culture shock coming from the slanging matches in the other forums If you are interested here is my website. Wedding Photography Sydney Ben Newnam - Wedding Photographers Sydney North Shore See if you think the Leica system will suit my style. Always open to constructive critisism. Cheers, Ben Hi Ben, looked at your photos and my feeling is you will improve your "play" regarding DOF. On top you will be more relaxed during weddings, because of the "light" equipment Looking forward to see results. Oliver Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OR120 Posted March 29, 2017 Share #43 Posted March 29, 2017 For me it is the 1.8/200 Canon and the 1.2/85 to stay with Canon. Leica extends my possibilities yet a lot, Franz Ah --- the Canon 200 1.8 -- the best sports lens I ever shot with -- superb lens Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.