LUF Admin Posted March 2, 2015 Share #1 Posted March 2, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) German magazine Manager-Magazin reports that Oliver Kaltner (Chief Marketing Officer) is going to replace Alfred Schopf as CEO: The End of Coziness Blackstone macht Druck - Leica wechselt Chef aus - manager magazin Google Translate: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.manager-magazin.de%2Funternehmen%2Findustrie%2Fblackstone-macht-druck-leica-wechselt-chef-aus-a-1021417.html&edit-text= 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Hi LUF Admin, Take a look here New Leica CEO?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted March 2, 2015 Share #2 Posted March 2, 2015 Hmmm.. Good news? Time will tell. I found Dr. Schopf quite a pleasant person 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rramesh Posted March 3, 2015 Share #3 Posted March 3, 2015 I sure hope a former Microsoft guy doesn't bring down Leica the way Nokia went down. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffry Abt Posted March 3, 2015 Share #4 Posted March 3, 2015 See Leica Rumors on this! Leica News & Rumors 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted March 3, 2015 Share #5 Posted March 3, 2015 See Leica Rumors on this!Leica News & Rumors Interesting - it could explain the recent flurry of discounts, special editions and make-overs, to generate cash quickly! I've said many times, Leica's biggest problem in recent years has been quality control. Too many products (for a company with a brand that has such a great reputation for quality) going out of the door faulty or faults developing once products are in the hands of customers - sensor corrosion, sensor covers cracking at will, bodies cracking when mounted on tripods, lenses poorly assembled, strap lugs falling off, body coverings peeling off...........how much money have these issues cost Leica? Yes there will always be some issues, nothing is ever perfect, but really some of the examples on this forum have been shocking - lenses assembled with aperture or focus rings back to front, sent out with a personally signed card to say the item had been inspected many times?! No excuses for that. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted March 3, 2015 Share #6 Posted March 3, 2015 Still, one can wonder whether the next CEO should come from the ranks of the Marketing Department. Leica's track record is less than brilliant there, like the initial mishandling of the sensor issue, the XVario introduction, etc.... 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo.Battista Posted March 3, 2015 Share #7 Posted March 3, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) It would be nice to see the real numbers from Leica, in order to understand which markets and which product families caused the losses. Maybe Leica has spent too much technical R&D resources for limited series of existing products and over-the-top lenses, which normally do not achieve big numbers due to the small numbers of units sold. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo.Battista Posted March 3, 2015 Share #8 Posted March 3, 2015 Still, one can wonder whether the next CEO should come from the ranks of the Marketing Department. Leica's track record is less than brilliant there, like the initial mishandling of the sensor issue, the XVario introduction, etc.... Indeed, even if the numbers of the last quarters and the forecasts for the next ones are really bad, this change does not seem to create a true discontinuity in the Leica strategies. A substitution of Schopf with the Chief of the Marketing Department? What it means? That the CEO didn't know how to sell the cameras? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Martin Posted March 3, 2015 Share #9 Posted March 3, 2015 Perhaps worth holding back from making any purchases for now. They may have to discount heavily to create a fast increase in cash flow, and it's clearly mentioned about quality control issues which people seem to have just brushed off as a slight inconvenience. It may have backfired? Things like the "T" really weren't market ready. There a suggestion of a model 116 ? Any ideas what that is ? The company may have to take a complete change of direction if Blackstone sell and Panasonic buy in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted March 3, 2015 Share #10 Posted March 3, 2015 Umm.. Wishful thinking? Nobody knows what a 116 might be. My guess is a new Panaleica to replace the C which seems to be rather forlorn. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted March 3, 2015 Share #11 Posted March 3, 2015 (edited) Hmmm.. Good news? Time will tell. I found Dr. Schopf quite a pleasant person Yes, he did me a favour recently when the usual people at Leica were being stubbornly unhelpful. Interesting to read the rumours re: Blackstone and recent financial performance. I've been saying here for a long time that you only have to talk to any dealer to know that the products haven't been selling well for at least a year or more. Incidentally, I notice that the two latest special editions – Kravitz and Safari – both feature the 35 Summicron when the recent norm has been to include the Summilux in these kits. I wonder whether this is a sign that one of the product announcements for this summer (I think the new Monochrom is a given) is a new 35 Summicron. If I recall correctly, the Monochrom was launched along with the 50 APO so they might want to do something similar this year? The 35 Summicron is arguably the quintessential Leica M lens and hasn't been updated in about 20 years. Edited March 3, 2015 by wattsy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2015 Share #12 Posted March 3, 2015 (edited) ...The company may have to take a complete change of direction if Blackstone sell and Panasonic buy inSeems to me it's not necessarily likely that Panasonic would take a major stake or control of Leica AG. Not that I have any knowledge of this, but Thom Hogan wrote the following last year: Panasonic has woken up to the fact that these negative ROI appendages are killing the overall company slowly. I suspect that Panasonic will fold their independent camera group, get out of the P&S business, and merge the remaining Micro 4/3 stuff into the pro video group as a temporary solution...Olympus and Panasonic just never got to their promised land in volume before the camera sales declines hit them. One call also make the opposite argument, but my point is that, unless one has a deeper knowledge of the camera sector from a business point of view, there is no point to speculate whether and who might take a major stake in Leica AG. Edited March 3, 2015 by not_a_hero Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted March 3, 2015 Share #13 Posted March 3, 2015 Panasonic have a long relationship with Leica and prior to the Kauffman takeover had helped secure the future of the company by loaning them €15m when Leica were pretty much insolvent. Leica, with their rebranded compacts, are an important (and prestigious) customer of Panasonic's and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if the Japanese company took a strategic stake (or bought out Blackstone). 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted March 3, 2015 Share #14 Posted March 3, 2015 It would be nice to see the real numbers from Leica, in order to understand which markets and which product families caused the losses.Maybe Leica has spent too much technical R&D resources for limited series of existing products and over-the-top lenses, which normally do not achieve big numbers due to the small numbers of units sold. I might be even nicer to see whether there are losses or not. As far as I am aware this is pure speculation. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M9reno Posted March 3, 2015 Share #15 Posted March 3, 2015 I wonder how much money the sensor corrosion issue has cost, including R&D diverted towards finding a "permanent solution"? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Martin Posted March 3, 2015 Share #16 Posted March 3, 2015 I wonder how much money the sensor corrosion issue has cost, including R&D diverted towards finding a "permanent solution"? From both a financial and reputation point. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUF Admin Posted March 3, 2015 Author Share #17 Posted March 3, 2015 Here is the official press release: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-news/2015/03/oliver-kaltner-new-ceo-of-leica-camera-ag/ 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
semi-ambivalent Posted March 3, 2015 Share #18 Posted March 3, 2015 ...bodies cracking when mounted on tripods... Now this I had not heard of. Not M bodies certainly, or were they? thanks, s-a Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenInTime Posted March 3, 2015 Share #19 Posted March 3, 2015 Now this I had not heard of. Not M bodies certainly, or were they? The M8/M9/MM baseplate has a thin rectangular slot for body key. This is a weak design compared to the traditional M baseplate pin with a flat. The M.240 seems to have resolved this with solid chassis threaded mount that passes through the baseplate - a solution even more robust than the film M design. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted March 3, 2015 Share #20 Posted March 3, 2015 M8/M9/MM problem, solved in the M. Edit - Frozenintime was a faster poster than I was 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.