|
|||||||
| Leica X1 / Leica X2 The Leica X Forum is about the Leica X1 and the new Leica X2. |
Leica Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leica M » eBay | Adorama | B+H | Dale |
Leica M-E » eBay | Adorama | B+H | Dale |
Leica M Monochrom » eBay | Adorama | B+H | Dale |
Leica S » eBay | B+H | Dale |
LEICA D-LUX 6 » eBay | Adorama | B+H | Dale |
LEICA X2 Amazon | » eBay | Adorama | B+H | Dale |
![]() |
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Neuer Benutzer
Join Date: 26/03/07
Posts: 20
|
One a trip to London I bought a second Hand X1 for 399 pounds. I want to use it as backup for my M8.2 with Elmarit 28 asph. So after a few days in work with the X1 AF only was a bit frustrating to me because focus was not where I want. Working with MF might be an opportunity in combination with an optical viewfinder. Image quality so far is quite good but still not on the same level as the M8 Elmarit Combo.
My question is ! what is your workflow including PP to get the best out of X1 or is the X2 a better choice. spiegellos |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 25/03/04
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 763
|
I got one very cheap too (there were quite a few for sale right after the introduction of the X2 and that Sony FF compact), as a backup for my M9. There are a few frustrations and several good things to be said for it.
To start with the good ones: manual exposure is even easier than with the M9. Use it intelligently, and far fewer of your shots will require lots of PP. High ISO is better than the M9 (but this is partly lost by the slower lens). Center spot AF is VERY accurate, and very selective; forget about multi-field, face recognition & c. Framing via the LCD (don´t own any accessory finder) is awkward in strong light, but far more exact than any RF window gives. For the frustrations: it´s VERY slow when reviewing the shots, and the AF is quite slow as well. One has to give it the time it needs; there´s no lock that prevents one to shoot before it has finished focussing, so wait for the green signal... The battery capacity is quite low; one or two extras are mandatory for a day´s shooting. Also, once it turns off the display (even if it hasn´t gone to sleep), it takes several seconds to get it ready to shoot again. And, once it has retracted the lens....Zzzzzz..... In all, I´d say the image quality matches that of my M9 + 35/2 Asph unless one really startys to pixel-peep - if used in the right way. The risk with P/S type cameras is that one doesn´t take it seriously enough when handling it, and then the results are sub-par - even with a Leica! |
|
|
|
| Thank You say... | Cheekyguille (10/02/13), rudingshain (11/02/13) |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Neuer Benutzer
Join Date: 21/10/12
Posts: 10
|
I have the X2 and from what I can tell looking at X1 photos online I don't think there is much point in upgrading.
I haven't tried the AF on the X1 but on the X2 it is also slow. Very slow when coming from a DSLR. I usually just zonefocus if there's to much movement. In PP the X2 files can take quite a lot of beating. But i guess it's the same. You can have a look at yanidel.net. He shoots both with M9 and X1 and is quite skilled when it comes to PP. I probably wouldn't manage a pepsichallenge between the two. |
|
|
|
| Thank You says | rudingshain (11/02/13) |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 29/06/06
Location: Gtr London
Posts: 11,054
|
Hi, can you explain what you mean by this? How can it be easier?
|
|
|
|
| Thank You says | rudingshain (11/02/13) |
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 25/03/04
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 763
|
Quote:
The actual setting process of the wheels/rings are more or less the same, but the meter readout is more informative on the X1. Since one can see how far off one is on a scale (not just the ´over´ and ´under´ arrows), one can actually use a kind of zone system with it directly. With the M9 one has to first center the reading, then offset this while counting the steps on the appropriate wheel/ring. Not a big thing, but still some difference. |
|
|
|
|
| Thank You say... | earleygallery (09/02/13), rudingshain (11/02/13) |
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: 21/06/06
Location: Airstrip 1 - 53°17.5'N, 03°05'W
Posts: 24,732
|
I have an X1 and yes, the focus is very, very slow. I have had some frustrations with the firmware too, but it is the camera that is always in my briefcase.
I have had no problem at all with the quality of the images that it produces. Here are links to a few recent X1 shots. http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...sentinels.html http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...breakfast.html http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...iver-kent.html http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...ide-groom.html
__________________
Andy Any comment here is just my opinion. Yours may differ. Any comment posted in a dark red bold font is posted as a Moderator Website: 1st April 2013 Blog: "Still My Turn This Year": 30th April 2013 __________________________________________________ Leica User Forum Book 2012 for AICR Charity still available |
|
|
|
| Thank You says | rudingshain (11/02/13) |
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 15/12/07
Location: italy
Posts: 541
|
I agree the focus being slow, and I admit in a few cases I lost some good (at least potentially good
) photo because of it. But due to the small size, easy of use I have the x1 very oft with me and this gave me opportunity to get some shots which I had not taken with a faster and bigger AF camera because probably in that case this camera had been left at home. robert
__________________
the quiet photographer's blog |
|
|
|
| Thank You say... | andybarton (10/02/13), rudingshain (11/02/13) |
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 30/03/05
Location: Wiltshire UK
Posts: 4,513
|
Quote:
Processing is a bigger issue. I use LR4 and work logically through the right-hand panel. Not all adjustments are tweaked. For optimum results I use the Develop Present 'Zeroed' to remove any default changes already made. Then I start afresh. In my view, there is no set formula for successful processing. Devote some time watching Adobe or other on-line video tutorials; or work through a recommended primer. You will find the best combination of settings to suit you. I batch process when appropriate and then fine-tune selected shots. I hope this helps you. I nearly forgot. Create Virtual Copies if you want two or more variations on an original. I do this when both colour and monochrome files are needed. |
|
|
|
|
| Thank You says | rudingshain (11/02/13) |
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Neuer Benutzer
Join Date: 26/03/07
Posts: 20
|
Thank you for your comments. X1 is a very nice piece of a camera and I think that we will be friends. The form factor is a big + and when the shutter speed is not to slow ( 1/30 and faster) picture quality is really good. Like everything it took time to get firm with the camera and it´s quirks. Manual focussing (Zone) will be my first choice. But next X should have a build in EVF. Now I use the same PP presets in Lightroom 4.3 as for the M8 with very good results. It is hard to point out which was the M8 only when you look to the fine detail. But when it comes to print I am sure no one can say which was the M8 and the X1.
spiegellos |
|
|
|
| Thank You say... | robert blu (12/02/13), wda (11/02/13) |
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Neuer Benutzer
Join Date: 29/01/13
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Is there in LR4.3 a present for M8 that you use for your x1 too, or do you have your own present for M8 that you use for X1? thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Neuer Benutzer
Join Date: 26/03/07
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28616805@N00/8122719439/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Neuer Benutzer
Join Date: 29/01/13
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
thanks G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 13/05/05
Location: Chicago
Posts: 672
|
Yes you can. I do this often on my x1
__________________
take a peek @ my pix http://prk60091.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 15/12/07
Location: italy
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
robert
__________________
the quiet photographer's blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 13/05/05
Location: Chicago
Posts: 672
|
with any "hyperfocus" system the distance will always be approximate whether shot at f/8 or f/2.8 ... of course you get a larger DOF w/ f/8 or f/11 than f/2.8....
__________________
take a peek @ my pix http://prk60091.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 15/12/07
Location: italy
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
but it works !robert PS: of course within the range !
__________________
the quiet photographer's blog |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Current eBay Ads |
|
Current bid:
395 USD (0 bids)
Current bid:
358 GBP (20 bids)
Current bid:
510 GBP (19 bids) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|