Jump to content

90mm or adaptor for Canon lens?


Jakobben

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi

 

I have an M240 with 50mm and 28mm lens. I'm considering adding something longer, though I expect I won't be giving it very much use comparatively. I have Canon 60D with a 70-200mm, which I rarely use, but when I do, I love using the longer focal length for certain applications. However, the 60D IQ rarely impresses me anymore (ugly noise, even at the lower ISO ranges).

 

I'm dabbling a bit between a few options:

1) Getting an adapter to mount the 70-200 on the M240.

2) Getting a used 90mm Elmarit-M

3) Getting a tele zoom for my Fuji X-E1...

 

Does anyone have some good experiences with mounting a 70-200 on a Leica M? I haven't found a lot of good high-res images to look at...

 

AF isn't very important as I don't shoot anything fast moving. IQ is more important.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Elmarit M is a delightful lens, both in terms of the beautiful quality it is capable of, and its diminutive size for a 2.8 90mm lens.

 

I don't know the Canon lens you have, but I'd be very surprised if you weren't bowled over by the Elmarit M in comparison.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently opted for a used 90 Elmarit M (for M240), which I sent to DAG for quick inspection and grease replacement. Looks and feels new, for much less than half the price of a new 90, which seems about right given that it will see limited use compared to my other lenses.

 

Even if I had a Canon zoom, I'd never just take it along on a whim, and that would defeat one of the great benefits of the M system for me.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Elmarit M is a delightful lens, both in terms of the beautiful quality it is capable of, and its diminutive size for a 2.8 90mm lens.

 

I don't know the Canon lens you have, but I'd be very surprised if you weren't bowled over by the Elmarit M in comparison.

 

I happen to have the same three lenses, a 28mm & 50mm from Leica, and that 70-200 f/2.8 from Canon. The only issue with the Canon is not its image quality, which is excellent, but its size & weight. It's about 8 inches long (without the hood), and weighs almost 3 lbs. A load, not a whim carry. If you're going to use the 'long' lens for landscape/city/portrait photography I'd go for the Elmarit M. If wildlife//sports is your game, then the Canon.

Edited by Berth
Link to post
Share on other sites

I love using the longer focal length for certain applications. However, the 60D IQ rarely impresses me anymore (ugly noise, even at the lower ISO ranges).

 

I'd be very interested to see a comparison shot at a low ISO with your M and 60D to see this ugly noise you mention.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...