|
||||||||
| Leica M8 Forum The Leica M8 Forum is dedicated to everything around the Leica M8. |
The Leica Camera Forum is the biggest Leica community worldwide.
Please register, if you want to use all features of the Leica Forum!
![]() |
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 09/15/06
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
Gene |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 10/11/06
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
Kind Regards. Terry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 12/07/02
Location: Dubuque, Iowa
Posts: 293
|
I bought a demo M8 from Kurland, then got an email from Leica to send it in for a printed circuit replacement, and they also "adjusted all parts under warranty" .
No mention of any shutter work on the repair ticket. I had no issues with it, but wanted to get it done as it has only a 1 year warranty. At any rate, I swear the shutter sounds much quieter than before. I wonder if there is already a stealth shutter upgrade underway...
__________________
Phil |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 02/11/04
Location: UK
Posts: 734
|
Quote:
Bob. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Gesperrt
Join Date: 03/01/08
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 05/04/06
Location: London / Cheshire
Posts: 843
|
The message from Mr Daniels indicates that it can be done via firmware. A lot of us have been hoping for this for a long time, but now it does seem to be part of Leica's game plan!
Check: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...tml#post501412 |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Gesperrt
Join Date: 03/01/08
Posts: 203
|
"I cannot confirm that it will be in the next FW update, but we are checking it." doesn't say anywhere it can be done with firmware, or am I missing something? But if it can, or if it needs a change of a switch inside, I would go for it in a heartbeat. To me it definitely absolutely makes more sense than replacing the shutter, with a slower top speed and slower flash sync, for over a $1K. Unless there is like I've read some people say, a design fault in the original shutter, which even though mine just went south in the same way described by a few dozen others, I don't believe because it's the same shutter (supposedly) in the R8 and I had one of those and shot the heck out of it and the shutter never faultered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 03/01/06
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 2,087
|
No, but if re-cocking was initiated by a direct link between the shutter actuation mechanism and the motor, as some suspected, then surely Stefan Daniel would know about this, don’t you think? Obviously, there will be a lot of detail to be worked out, but to me, his answer suggests such a change would possible in principle at least.
__________________
Michael J. Hußmann |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Gesperrt
Join Date: 03/01/08
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 09/14/04
Location: Hellevoetsluis, Netherlands
Posts: 6,229
|
Well, he would hardly write:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 05/04/06
Location: London / Cheshire
Posts: 843
|
Jaap - agreed. And let's think about it folks. How many of us have had direct emails from the R&D team at Canon or Nikon as we've had to deal with wrinkles in their professional bodies? I appreciate the kind of risk that Mr Daniel may be taking in giving any kind of answer. As things stand I'm OK with waiting for a bit to see how things pan out. The new quiet shutter plus the actuate / re-cock separation will give me the M8 that I always wanted. It's good for my purposes as it stands (ok - a slightly better 1250 / 2500 would be fun), but it will really come back into its own as a discrete photo-reportage tool - and knock the socks off most of the competition in terms of portability, lack of intimidating bulk and some pretty good lenses!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Neuer Benutzer
Join Date: 07/15/08
Posts: 2
|
Leica user since 1992. Love the cameras, worship the lenses (F1 devotee) Was SO glad when M8 was announced. Ordered one immediately. So surprised at lack of attention the "purple" black received. A lot of photoshop was required before filters fixed the problem.
Now have just received my camera back from Germany to have the focus adjusted and realigned so my F1 lens will actually focus on what I do - totally different camera - thanks Leica and all at no cost. Now the noisy shutter. The noise I can cope with (just) but far more importantly I feel the vibration and jarring when the shutter is released is causing unsharpness of the image, much like a SLR, which I have always thought was a basic design fault. My M6s allowed me to sqeeze off hand held exposures down to 1/8 sec. My local dealer pointed out that the problem doesn't exist above 125th sec! Tell me, isn't the whole purpose of an M Leica low light photojournalist photography? I will obviously update to the new shutter if it can be proven to allow me to pull off slow exposures - or else I will have to buy a tripot and shoot tethered - oh no! |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 09/14/04
Location: Hellevoetsluis, Netherlands
Posts: 6,229
|
How can the vibration (which is there) cause unsharpness, when it is clearly felt AFTER the shutter closes -which is the case.? I have shot the M8 up to 1/2 sec with more than usable results - just like my film M's which show no vibration, but a faint lateral move of the camera caused by the impetus of the shutter.
Last edited by jaapv : 07/20/08 at 01:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 04/30/08
Location: Rohnert Park
Posts: 233
|
Most of my shooting is done in the wilderness where the only thing you can really hear is the wind, the birds and the sound of my M8. Comparison? How about a nail driver gun. Leica, please give us a silent mode in firmware upgrade so I don't have to pay $1,200 for a new shutter.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 11/12/02
Posts: 5,305
|
Quote:
The motor wind (whine?) of course has no effect on the picture just taken but it might have in continuous mode on the next one. Does seem the imperative at Leica when the original wass designed was to have something which worked at all rather that something which worked well.
__________________
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 01/11/06
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
But then I think the Epson is loud, and other people tell me it's not. Sound is so subjective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 05/17/08
Posts: 109
|
Hey, hey, hey, .....hello.
Yes, noise is high, is peculiar, like no other, is beautiful. You do not remember that harley Davison registration and patented noise his motorcycle? Leica should do the same. Greetings |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 11/12/02
Posts: 5,305
|
The noise and gearbox is quite quiet if you run it out of the camera; it's the lack of vibration isolation which transmits it to the casting causing it to ring like a bell which is the problem.
__________________
Mark |
|
|
|