Jump to content

From M240 back to the essential (M8)


Recommended Posts

John, your points are valid and well reasoned. . I have about $10k USD in Leica equipment, but that's an M4-P, an M8, an M9P, eight lenses and a Visoflex. I bought all of it used, and only three of the lenses are Leitz lenses and all of those from the late 1960s vintage. The M9P cost was half of that $10k.

 

I wouldn't have but probably the M8 body and three lenses if I weren't using the entire kit as a working pro.

 

Sometimes a reality check is just what you need. Gear doesn't make the photos.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

honestly john, seeing the line of cameras you had within the last five years, not counting the white m8, i think you will not be sticking to your m8-only-gear for very long. there will be the next m9 (basically a full frame m8, so it will be easy to use with m8-like PP). and if you stick to black&white, there will be the opportunity to get an mm for a good price - not now, but sometime in the future...

 

as we all know, GAS is nothing that's easy to cure ;) and leica makes it even more difficult.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

wow you've come full circle! :D

 

i think the M8 and the 40mm Summicron may be one of THE finest packages one could use made by Leica.....especially for the price. Great choice!

 

I used to have GAS....but got rid of it...by deciding that the quality of photos has to do with ME....not with my gear. So these days i am very happy with the M5 and M8....have no desire to buy anything else....it feels GREAT to be satisfied. Hopefully you enjoy this feeling as well!

 

cheers

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I must admit your story is well-reasoned and rational, and I will not say a single word against it, but in my case I have regretted selling each and every major piece of Leica gear I ever did, and ended up buying most of it back at a considerable financial loss. So I simply stopped doing it.:(

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I know how you feel John.

 

Over the years I must of spent thousands on Leica gear (around 35.000$) I did dispose some as trade in's

 

But still have a large collection. I just love the stuff and hate parting with it.

 

I am going to Japan with the 21-35, 28-90, R9 and the Canon DSLR the whole cost of that gear was

Around 9,500$ still cheaper then the M240 + hand grip, EVF and the R-M adaptor.

 

Walking around with that stuff is bad enough especially the weight, but If I buy the M240 and take that instead of the Canon DSLR it would be close to 20.000$.

 

I am at the age of 64 and in a comfortable financial position, but I am having this guilt about the cost of

Leica Digital gear and walking around with it.

 

Ken.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest rivercityrocker

If you know what you need and know what you like, stick with it. I've got 10's of thousands of dollars tied up in my Nikon gear, but it's my job.

 

I wanted to get the best Leica I could, which was the M240, but I couldn't justify it as a legitimate expense. I bought the M8 and a few lenses and ended up at around $4000 USD, which is still quite a bit for a camera I use mainly for "art".

 

It sounds like you thought things through very well and I think you'll be happy with your decision.

 

The M8 is far from a perfect camera, which ironically is one of the reasons I have come to adore it. The M8 renders B/W amazingly. The IR capability is a bonus in my eyes.

 

I generally use the UV/IR block filter, but sometimes I take it off and it gives my images an "expired film" look that is impossible to replicate using photoshop/lightroom filters. Here's an example:

8667583570_fa60c582b9.jpg

 

I believe that knowing what your camera can and can't do is more important than just getting a camera that you think can do everything.

  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

John, I can agree with you partly. I do not like to carry gear that is too expensive.So, when I was 'obliged' to take Leica's upgrade to M9 because of the coffee stain, I downgraded back to an M8 and sold the brand new M9. Sometime in the future I will buy a nice second hand M9. Mean while I enjoy my M8 and invested the rest of the money in a few lenses.

 

 

For lenses, I am on the same page as Jaap. I have no problem keeping gear that is holding its value. I avoid collector items that are so expensive that I would hesitate to use them, that is all.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good story and I agree with the consensus that an M8 and 40/F2 is a very strong combination that doesn't place you at a meaningful disadvantage to what you had before. I'm also with you on the notion of balancing "the value of ... gear and the use of it" and I rather wish I hadn't bought so much Leica gear over the years (it isn't so much the cost of the gear itself that bothers me but the number of lenses and bodies that I have churned through).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

sooo, I found my replacement gear, a nearly mint black M8 with 800 actuations only and a Summicron 40mm, both for very reasonable prices.

 

Bought it from an official Leica dealer and will get a 1 year guarantee.

 

My "expensive" stuff (50mm ASPH Lux, the M240, 90mm Elmarit, 80-200mm Vario Elmar-R) will be advertised soon here in the forum.....

 

Looking forward to use my low budget M. I will feel more comfortable when walking around with this instead of the 11.000 Euro bag:cool:

 

Thanks for the replies in this thread, I really appreciated this.

 

Enjoy your weekend

 

John

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

John, you are a brave man to make such a confession. But, having done so, I think this thread should enjoy a year as a 'sticky', just to inspire and save others who confuse GAS with actual successful photography. Long may you enjoy your M8 + 40. I would be tempted to keep the 90 though, just to have a nice balanced 2-lens practical travel kit.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a difference between costly and expensive gear. The capital tight up in a Leica M and lenses can be significant (cost). It is, however, not expensive as a system since the Leica lenses keep their value or even appreciate, easily compensating for the depreciation of the digital body. My excessive buying, trying and selling of other systems over the last couple of years (mft, NEX, Fuji) was definitely eating much more capital than my Leica M and lenses as all this stuff was sold at significant losses (expensive). Concerning guilt when walking around with costly Leica gear, how about the price of your wrist watch?

Edited by Ecaton
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a difference between costly and expensive gear. The capital tight up in a Leica M and lenses can be significant (cost). It is, however, not expensive as a system since the Leica lenses keep their value or even appreciate, easily compensating for the depreciation of the digital body. My excessive buying, trying and selling of other systems over the last couple of years (mft, NEX, Fuji) was definitely eating much more capital than my Leica M and lenses as all this stuff was sold at significant losses (expensive). Concerning guilt when walking around with costly Leica gear, how about the price of your wrist watch?

 

I have no watch:D:D:D

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest rivercityrocker

I tried a Summicron 40 yesterday and I REALLY liked it. Unfortunately they wouldn't sell it to me without the accompanying CL camera. I found that the 40mm is WAY more accurate for the the 35mm framelines than the 35mm is.

 

I'd like to throw the 40 in the mix, but I have a 28, 35, and 2 50's so a 40 really isn't needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found that the 40mm is WAY more accurate for the the 35mm framelines than the 35mm is.

 

Then you obviously didn't use an M8 with upgraded 2m frame lines, or an M8.2 with same. Or maybe you shoot really close distances.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a matter of dedication. I love photography and even if I don't make money with it's the hobby I have no spending limits on. When someone says: "Wow 9000€ for a lens? You can get a good car with that money." I think: "15'000€ for a car? I could get several lenses with that money".

 

Sadly as a student I can't afford the newest camera and best lenses, which is why I honestly am envious when users here talk about their M240s, MMs, Noctiluxes, APO-Summicrons and Summiluxes. The M8 is a nice camera. Age doesn't really make the image quality degrade. But I still would wish to have more resolution. 18MP from the M9 would be perfect for me. There are also situations where I wish I had a fast lens and better high iso.

 

Those situations aren't that common and they often have a workaround like using a tripod but it still would be nice. One probably needs to have the best gear first before being able to realize that one doesn't really need it that much.

 

But then again this depends on your shooting style.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest rivercityrocker
Then you obviously didn't use an M8 with upgraded 2m frame lines, or an M8.2 with same. Or maybe you shoot really close distances.

 

Jeff

 

Yeah, obviously not. Or maybe I do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...