Jump to content

Two things confirmed to me...


marknorton

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

... at Photokina.

 

1. No new EVF for the M Typ 240. Seemed like for ever. What you have now is all you'll ever get, so keep that in mind if an M-P takes your fancy. It's old iron already.

 

2. The APO 50 recall replaced one of the lens elements in the lens followed by test and calibration.

  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

In one product i.e. the M60, Leica has taken away a desire in me to see new features in LCD, additional control buttons, on-board post processing, shutter release cable, choice of an appropriate strap, worry about a visible screw and what to paste on it, amongst others.

 

Now if only, they had removed the hot shoe, I would not have to worry about choice of a flash, or viewfinder, a thumbs up or other ridiculous products.

 

I love the M60. And if this a statement of Leica's future for a rangefinder, I am sold.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now if only, they had removed the hot shoe, I would not have to worry about choice of a flash, or viewfinder, a thumbs up or other ridiculous products.
:D:D

 

If they'd removed the rangefinder, no need to worry about focus. Remove the viewfinder and no worry about framing. Remove the lens mount and no need to fuss over lens selection. Remove the shutter release and you'd never have to worry about photography!

 

This is getting expensive, though. Each feature removed would cost an additional US$5000 :eek: By the time they remove the whole camera that small piece of thin air is starting to cost a lot of money! Then they'll remove the air, one GAS at a time :rolleyes:

 

...Mike

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

For those of us having been a little off-line recently - do you have a link to this info?

I take “Two things confirmed to me at Photokina” to mean that these points were raised by Mark talking to some Leica representative at photokina and that’s what they’ve said. If it was published on the web he didn’t have to ask.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So far I have not returned my APO 50. I wonder if it is necessary or not. Will the lens element fail at some point or was this just a bad run on this lens. I wish Leica had give more detailed information upfront.

 

I received my APO 50 on January 31, 2013, and it was obviously an early production piece. Yes, it will flare when I point it so that the sun is just above one of the upper corners of the frame. But the images are all beautiful, and I have never considered sending it back to Leica to mess around with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

... at Photokina.

 

1. No new EVF for the M Typ 240. Seemed like for ever. What you have now is all you'll ever get, so keep that in mind if an M-P takes your fancy. It's old iron already.

 

2. The APO 50 recall replaced one of the lens elements in the lens followed by test and calibration.

 

The EVF was old when the 240 was launched

No news there

It does it's job great for R lenses and accurate framing but 99% of the time I use the RF which is a major part of why I like the M series, apart from the lenses

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my APO 50 on January 31, 2013, and it was obviously an early production piece. Yes, it will flare when I point it so that the sun is just above one of the upper corners of the frame. But the images are all beautiful, and I have never considered sending it back to Leica to mess around with.

I agree. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Someone here in the past said that eventually every APO 50 would need to be returned but who knows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my APO 50 in August 2013.

While the lens was indeed glorious, it flared horribly.

Whenever it flared, the entire image would be washed out.

 

I was reluctant to return it, and debated living with it as it was.

However, because this lens is so special, I decided to return it to Leica for correction

I did so in April 2014, and received it back four months later, in August.

 

What I notice is that the edge of the rear lens element is now blackened.

My recollection is that previously it was not.

So it seems that the lens element which Leica replaces is this one.

 

The lens still gives glorious images, and now only flares if deliberately provoked.

It will not flare under circumstances which previously would have washed out the entire image.

Even when it doe flare, the flare is limited.

 

No regrets.

My advice is to return it. The lens can only be improved, not degraded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark. I suspected a coating problem on on one of the surfaces of an element. I returned my APO 50 in the first week.

 

Also, the problem is not when you point it at the sun. This would be normal. The problem occurs under other conditions and I'm sure all of the first generation lenses do this to some degree.

 

Anyone asking above; I would certainly send your $8,000 lens back to Leica and have the new element exchanged. Leica is not going to send you a personal invitation to gut their profit statement. Come on.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my APO 50 in August 2013.

While the lens was indeed glorious, it flared horribly.

Whenever it flared, the entire image would be washed out.

 

I was reluctant to return it, and debated living with it as it was.

However, because this lens is so special, I decided to return it to Leica for correction

I did so in April 2014, and received it back four months later, in August.

 

What I notice is that the edge of the rear lens element is now blackened.

My recollection is that previously it was not.

So it seems that the lens element which Leica replaces is this one.

 

The lens still gives glorious images, and now only flares if deliberately provoked.

It will not flare under circumstances which previously would have washed out the entire image.

Even when it doe flare, the flare is limited.

 

No regrets.

My advice is to return it. The lens can only be improved, not degraded.

 

I did the same and am happy that I did. It is a wonderful lens and I wanted to remove any doubts when I am using it. It did take a long time to repair but now I am happy that I had it done.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The EVF was old when the 240 was launched

No news there

It does it's job great for R lenses and accurate framing but 99% of the time I use the RF which is a major part of why I like the M series, apart from the lenses

 

Microview is parsing your sentence differently from how you intended, for comic effect.

 

Your intention:

I like the M series because of the RF although my main reason for liking it is the lenses.

 

Microview's reading:

I like the M series because of the RF although I don't like the lenses.

 

"Apart from" can be applied to what you like (Microview) or what you think is the most likable feature (you).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Microview is parsing your sentence differently from how you intended, for comic effect.

 

 

 

Your intention:

 

I like the M series because of the RF although my main reason for liking it is the lenses.

 

 

 

Microview's reading:

 

I like the M series because of the RF although I don't like the lenses.

 

 

 

"Apart from" can be applied to what you like (Microview) or what you think is the most likable feature (you).

 

 

You think ?

Something else to do today ...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...