Jump to content

Voigtlander Color Heliar 75mm f/2.5 lens


wilfredo

Recommended Posts

Fantastic lens - worth twice the money it costs! The smallest and lightest of my 75mm's.

 

Some samples off my M9:

 

http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20124/2221_L1025031_1.jpg

 

http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20124/2221_L1025334_1.jpg

 

http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20124/2221_L1025039_1.jpg

 

http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20124/2221_L1025079_1.jpg

Edited by TheGodParticle
broken url
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is interresting to note that this lens has a loyal fan base among Leica shooters on this forum. Certainly the price is an incentive. I will have to go to Adorama and check it out. Thank you all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Wilfredo,

 

Here is a small selection I just uploaded to my flickr, showing how the 75 Heliar looks like on the Mono.

It is not a super sharp lens, lacking that special cracking punch wide open, a 50 Summicron or the Leica 75 Summicron would show, but it does have a special something I like.

It's tiny, lightweight (yet with a really beautiful built quality) and renders nice, smooth backgrounds.

It has a medium contrast already wide open, delivering files with the Mono that allow for plenty of contrast in the scene, not cutting off blacks entirely - it is my sunny day 75mm lens (Shanghai has REALLY high contrasts during the summer days).

 

14714557962_783f453319_c.jpgL1060417-M Monochrom—for_flickr by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

 

14712462154_b27235485f_c.jpgM Monochrom - first shots - man walking dog meeting another man by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

 

14711668341_1e76047141_c.jpgM Monochrom - first shots - portrait - two generations by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

 

14711671791_deb3249fda_c.jpgM Monochrom - first shots - worker preparing a tool handle by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting these Dirk. I agree, the photos have a certain "je ne sais quoi" that I think is part of the Leica look. I have a 50mm ASPH LUX, it's a very sharp lens, but I don't always need that sharpness. This lens, will mostly be a portrait lens. It is a definite contender. Women hate my 50mm ASPH LUX!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wilfredo, women will love the 75/2.5, they would love more a 75 Summilux though ;-)

 

Steve, let's settle on "the 75/2.5 shows a lot less detail than comparable modern lenses at wide apertures".

 

I don't specialise in specific phrases, many forum users are professing in :-(

The 75/2.5 (I have had three) shows a LOT less detail below f4 on both M9 and Mono than 75 Summilux, 85 Nikkor LTM, 85 Canon LTM.

It is a characteristic, I see immediately when bringing up a shot in a set on my computer and can be seen in prints.

 

If one wants fine detail from this lens, it has to be stopped down to f4 at least.

It does have a certain smoothness to it's background rendering in return though and probably buys its compactness in big part with the loss in detail/ sharpness/ micro contrast, or what ever you want to call it.

 

I would NOT recommend the 75mm when fine detail (like skin texture) should be resolved at wide apertures.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dirk:

 

Your comments are well received. I will be using this lens mostly for portraiture and I don't want excessive

detail. I've seen some very convincing photos with this lens on Flickr, with the lens on Leica cameras. I decided to go for it. I found one today in minty condition at Adorama, and purchased it for $389.00. It looks almost new even though they rated it Excellent +. I took a few shots with it on my Leica MM, and I will put them on the computer screen later tonight for a close look. So far so good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got to see some shots tonight on the computer screen and I'm very pleased. I can tell I will be getting good mileage from this lens. It's a keeper. My thanks to all those who helped me make the decision. I posted a photo here:

 

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/people/340008-no-frills-portrait-saldana.html#post2743658

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Steve, let's settle on "the 75/2.5 shows a lot less detail than comparable modern lenses at wide apertures".

 

I don't specialise in specific phrases, many forum users are professing in :-(

The 75/2.5 (I have had three) shows a LOT less detail below f4 on both M9 and Mono than 75 Summilux, 85 Nikkor LTM, 85 Canon LTM.

It is a characteristic, I see immediately when bringing up a shot in a set on my computer and can be seen in prints.

 

.

 

9166128925_58023e1f45_b.jpg

 

An example of the CV 75mm f/2.5 being soft and unsharp wide open. It is a crop, but I can hardly see any detail, I focused on his eyes and they are just vague blobs :rolleyes:

 

Steve

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...