Jump to content

M lens codes


andybarton

Recommended Posts

Thank you Andy. It is not the latest version though. That of 15.11.2011 adds:

 

Lens Name: Super-Elmar-M 21mm f/3.4 ASPH.

Product # Black: 11145

Product # Chrome: -

Lens Code: 110011

Value: 51

Picture: -

Frames: 28/90

Other Lenses: -

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest gamincurieux

According to your list the Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM should be coded as Leica #11135 (Elmarit-M 21mm f/2.8 ASPH)....... #11135? Are you sure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to your list the Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM should be coded as Leica #11135 (Elmarit-M 21mm f/2.8 ASPH)....... #11135? Are you sure?
It is the best code for the M8, for the M9 the 11134 code works better.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest gamincurieux

Mm ok, well I've already sent to lenscodes@l-camera-forum.com a couple of days ago a table that Zeiss sent to me, which lists all their ZM lenses & the Leica profiles/codes they say they work best with.... guess you've not seen that yet?

 

#11135 is not recommended at all for the ZM 21/2,8...... a few different ones are, with one 'best' one, but not #11135.

 

This information has been gathered since 2006 by a forum member.

 

If you have better information, please pass this on.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can I just confirm that I was originally hosting this table as a favour to the community. It's not my table and I was even having difficulty editing it.

 

It has now been taken over permanently by Andreas who is at the end of the email address given and who has kindly taken over the management of it. I have no input into this.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent Andreas the code (110011) for the new 21/3.4 Super Elmar, which is not in the table. I got it from a not quite clear picture on PopPhoto, but have confirmed it by inspection of an actual lens. The picture at the top should indeed be rotated 180 degrees. It looks like a 75/2,0 APO which should have the code 100100. Upside down, it might be read 001001.

 

scott

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

There's no Zeiss table or list that I'm aware of because they're not Leica lenses. Leica would be unlikely to assign codes to lenses manufactured by its competitors.

 

If you want to code a Zeiss wide-angle lens to benefit from vignetting and colour correction you'll need to pick a Leica lens with similar focal length and maximum aperture, apply that and take your chances.

 

Pete.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no Zeiss table or list that I'm aware of because they're not Leica lenses. Leica would be unlikely to assign codes to lenses manufactured by its competitors.

 

If you want to code a Zeiss wide-angle lens to benefit from vignetting and colour correction you'll need to pick a Leica lens with similar focal length and maximum aperture, apply that and take your chances.

 

Pete.

 

I assume that rceric refers to the post of gamincurieux

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a code now for the 135/3.4 Apo Telyt, since that is an approved and current production lens for the M9. I would like to hand code my 135 T-E as the above lens, since I keep forgetting to change to manual coding, given that all my other non-Viso lenses are now either properly coded or working hand coded.

 

I have tried hand coding as a 135 Elmarit-M (spec's lens) but that does not seem to pick up, as that lens brings up the 28/90 frame against the 135 T-E brings up the 35/135 frame, like the Apo-Telyt.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found the code on another thread - it is 001010 reading clockwise round the back of the lens. It worked first time on hand coding - I must be getting better at this, finally. I will add this to the Wiki.

 

Wilson

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That code for the 135/f3.4 does not pick up on the M8. Now I know from long experience that the M8's IR sensors are much fussier than the M9's ones, so I don't know if this is a "feature" on the M8 or my less than 100% accurate hand coding. I would be interested to hear other's experience.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...