Jump to content

New Leica


Recommended Posts

It would surprise me greatly if Leica did not add the LX100 to their stable. With features like shutter speed dial, aperture ring and rangefinder styling, it is the most Leica-like camera Panasonic has made in years. It will beat the LX7/D-Lux 6 for image quality easily, and offer a fast lens alternative to the X Vario.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hum... this move to 4/3 and with such a fine (apparently) camera, seems to me that creates a bit of confusion around the X Vario... :rolleyes:... ok that it's a "PanaLeica" and doesn't sport the "made in Germany" of the X Vario... but target is similar...

 

Good observation... I was in search of a camera to replace my XV (that I ended up returning recently). The search is over :)

 

Ece

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It IS a nice camera, and rather "Leica-like". I guess we'll know soon whether Leica will re-enter the arena of 4/3rds cameras.:)

Maybe finally a successor for the Digilux2?

 

at least with panasonic engineers they can put a EVF in a smaller body then the new X typ 113

 

anyway i m not crazy about both panasonic...now they found this cheap way to do multiaspect sensor....to use the standard 16mp sensor and to crop at 12mp

 

well panasonic....instead to go forward you are going back...the ORIGINAL multiaspect sensor used in GH1 and GH2 was a sensor bigger then 4/3 in size...and so when using the multiaspect you could have used all pixel...instead to drop from 16 to 12...

 

so a real multiaspect sensor must have more mp then 16 and being longer and taller in mm then 4/3 sensor (like was for GH1 and GH2)

Link to post
Share on other sites

at least with panasonic engineers they can put a EVF in a smaller body then the new X typ 113

 

anyway i m not crazy about both panasonic...now they found this cheap way to do multiaspect sensor....to use the standard 16mp sensor and to crop at 12mp

 

well panasonic....instead to go forward you are going back...the ORIGINAL multiaspect sensor used in GH1 and GH2 was a sensor bigger then 4/3 in size...and so when using the multiaspect you could have used all pixel...instead to drop from 16 to 12...

 

so a real multiaspect sensor must have more mp then 16 and being longer and taller in mm then 4/3 sensor (like was for GH1 and GH2)

 

You probably noticed that new LX100 is much smaller than GH1. Even cropped 4/3 sensor is a lot of pixels on such a small camera.

 

Small body, fast zoom, built in EVF, manual controls for speed, aperture and exposure compensation Panasonic and Leica clone are probably best thing to come from Photokina in compact camera category.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just came back from Photokina. The DLux is a very nice camera. Its design is indeed very Leica-like and it fits well with the M and XV. By comparison the LX100 is rather ugly.

 

The new DLux is, however, significantly larger than its predecessor. It is certainly attractive to me but would not so easily slip in a small pocket like my trusty DLux 4.

 

Martin

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

well panasonic....instead to go forward you are going back...the ORIGINAL multiaspect sensor used in GH1 and GH2 was a sensor bigger then 4/3 in size...and so when using the multiaspect you could have used all pixel...instead to drop from 16 to 12...

 

so a real multiaspect sensor must have more mp then 16 and being longer and taller in mm then 4/3 sensor (like was for GH1 and GH2)

 

Maybe that's because Panasonic factors in the 4K video capability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new DLux is, however, significantly larger than its predecessor. It is certainly attractive to me but would not so easily slip in a small pocket like my trusty DLux 4.

 

Martin

 

I think so too. However,I hope that color rendering from D-Lux type 109 can be in par with that of D-Lux 4.

 

From my own percpetion in use experience, that of D-Lux 4 is beter than D-Lux 5, and that of D-Lux 5 is better than D-Lux 6.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just came back from Photokina. The DLux is a very nice camera. Its design is indeed very Leica-like and it fits well with the M and XV. By comparison the LX100 is rather ugly.

 

Martin

 

 

Impressive how leica simplify make elegant.

I would take the Dlux 109 for the look & leica after sales service, warranty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...