Michael-IIIf Posted June 27, 2014 Share #1 Posted June 27, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Apple kills off Aperture in favour of new Photos (what a stupid name). Apple kills development of Aperture and iPhoto for OS X | Cult of Mac 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 27, 2014 Posted June 27, 2014 Hi Michael-IIIf, Take a look here Apple: Aperture is dead. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Jennifer Posted June 27, 2014 Share #2 Posted June 27, 2014 Apple kills off Aperture in favour of new Photos (what a stupid name). Apple kills development of Aperture and iPhoto for OS X | Cult of Mac Will anyone mourn the demise of Aperture? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
40mm f/2 Posted June 27, 2014 Share #3 Posted June 27, 2014 Yes, I have both LR and Aperture. LR has more options (as Aperture did not get updated) and better printing. But I much more liked the file management and nondestructive adjustment of Aperture. It is very easy to revert one action in Aperture at any time but not in LR. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted June 27, 2014 Share #4 Posted June 27, 2014 Apple To Cease Development Of Aperture And Transition Users To Photos For OS X | TechCrunch Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted June 27, 2014 Share #5 Posted June 27, 2014 Will anyone mourn the demise of Aperture? The people who use it may. The new Apple program is aimed at the iPhoto market. More sales for Lightroom I guess. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael-IIIf Posted June 27, 2014 Author Share #6 Posted June 27, 2014 Will anyone mourn the demise of Aperture? I thought long and hard about whether to go the LightRoom or Aperture route. As an Apple user it was tempting to choose Aperture. I'm so glad I didn't. Apple have dumbed down Pages (which I use) and Numbers and now they look like they will be dumbing down Aperture. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berth Posted June 27, 2014 Share #7 Posted June 27, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Apple kills off Aperture in favour of new Photos (what a stupid name). Apple kills development of Aperture and iPhoto for OS X | Cult of Mac Ugh. I've got over 13,000 photos in my Aperture library. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted June 27, 2014 Share #8 Posted June 27, 2014 Apple kills off Aperture I am not at all surprised; this was bound to happen sooner or later. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptZoom Posted June 28, 2014 Share #9 Posted June 28, 2014 Yes, I have both LR and Aperture. LR has more options (as Aperture did not get updated) and better printing. But I much more liked the file management and nondestructive adjustment of Aperture. It is very easy to revert one action in Aperture at any time but not in LR. LR is nondestructive as well. There is a history tab on the left in the develop module. You can go back as many step as you please. That being said, you lose history if you go back and affect a change. In other words if you go back five steps and then adjust a setting you will loose what were previously steps one through four because you will have started a new history of steps. Perhaps Aperture functioned differently? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
40mm f/2 Posted June 28, 2014 Share #10 Posted June 28, 2014 LR is nondestructive as well. There is a history tab on the left in the develop module. You can go back as many step as you please. That being said, you lose history if you go back and affect a change. In other words if you go back five steps and then adjust a setting you will loose what were previously steps one through four because you will have started a new history of steps. Perhaps Aperture functioned differently? Yes you exactly describe why I liked aperture better. You can reverse any action at any time without messing up the rest. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptZoom Posted June 28, 2014 Share #11 Posted June 28, 2014 Yes you exactly describe why I liked aperture better. You can reverse any action at any time without messing up the rest. That's fantastic. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted June 28, 2014 Share #12 Posted June 28, 2014 Yes you exactly describe why I liked aperture better. You can reverse any action at any time without messing up the rest. Easy to do in LR by creating another virtual copy. Jeff 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted June 28, 2014 Share #13 Posted June 28, 2014 http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-post-processing-forum/337054-apple-aperture-dead.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolaz Posted June 28, 2014 Share #14 Posted June 28, 2014 They were not that far from been "perfect": a built-in non-destructive layer for plugins would have given a really long life since the possibility to extend functionality with no effort from apple. It could really have been a good software on which develop on. Perhaps the new Photo will be the union of iPhoto and Aperture with basic and advances features!? Either ways, I have a lot of pics on Aperture and I don't really like LR.. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlindstrom Posted June 28, 2014 Share #15 Posted June 28, 2014 Sad news that.. I've tried to like Lightroom over Aperture several times but always end up going back to Aperture. The user interface just fits me better. Hope the new app will turn out good for what I need. Also, I do hope they'll keep the Aperture plugin system as is.. otherwise the new app will have a hard time. So many great plugins are out there for Aperture and if they kill those, I wonder how many companies will choose to rewamp for Photos thinking "wonder how long this will last?". //Juha 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptZoom Posted June 28, 2014 Share #16 Posted June 28, 2014 Easy to do in LR by creating another virtual copy. Jeff True but the history of the patent file is gone in the copy, isn't it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timde Posted June 28, 2014 Share #17 Posted June 28, 2014 Will anyone mourn the demise of Aperture? Yeah, I will I did enough for me, the new "Photos" looks like it will be a step in the direction of iPhoto ... so might as well try something else! Is there a equivalent which allows sharing of photo libraries between computers and users? And without the "Cloud" pricing model. I don't think so? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire53 Posted June 28, 2014 Share #18 Posted June 28, 2014 liked the Aperture user interface and workflow, but didn't liked it too much with the Monochrom. C1 in my mind is the best raw converter for Monochrom, so I used C1 for raw to tiff and used tiff in aperture for editing and printing with RIP software. I used iPhoto as a repository for low res jpeg and to search for pictures. I will give the new Photos a try, when it's out. I hope they leave the add on working the same way and got a good Monochrom convertion Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamiji Posted June 28, 2014 Share #19 Posted June 28, 2014 I am not at all surprised; this was bound to happen sooner or later. Yes, this is the trend of Apple. I have learned not to trust Apple for mission critical apps. Like their online services, the playing field is likely to change with little notice. For an example, I had my entire website on .Mac, now I run it myself. Apple expects and often gets there customers to just go with Apples whim. It's not the first, it won't be the last. I worry about the future of Pages, Numbers, and the like... P.S. On a separate note, I miss PageMaker... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted June 28, 2014 Share #20 Posted June 28, 2014 True but the history of the patent file is gone in the copy, isn't it? If you always work on virtual copies, not 'original' files, you can keep and compare unlimited versions, with relevant history. Jeff Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.