CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4

lct · 03.05.2008, 22:53

CV 35/1.4 SC (single coated) vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4.
R-D1, 200 iso, subject distance 1.2 meter, raws developped with Silkypix.
Full frame, Summilux, f/ 8:

lct · 03.05.2008, 22:54

100% crops, f/1.4, Summilux below:

lct · 03.05.2008, 22:55

100% crops, f/2, Summilux below:

lct · 03.05.2008, 22:56

100% crops, f/2.8, Summilux below:

lct · 03.05.2008, 22:56

100% crops, f/4, Summilux below:

lct · 03.05.2008, 22:57

100% crops, f/5.6, Summilux below:

lct · 03.05.2008, 22:58

100% crops, f/8, Summilux below:

harmsr · 04.05.2008, 01:32

Hey LCT,

It seems that your CV is on at 1.4 but focus shifts as you stop down. It seems that your Lux is front focussed at 1.4 then focus shifts as you stop down bringing the focus in.

Otherwise the appear to draw in a similar fashion.

Best,

Ray

lct · 04.05.2008, 10:50

Contrast, bokeh, CA.
Full frame, f/ 8, Summilux below:

lct · 04.05.2008, 10:52

Contrast, bokeh, CA.
100% crops, f/1.4 & f/2, Summilux below:

lct · 04.05.2008, 10:53

Contrast, bokeh, CA.
100% crops, f/2.8 & f/4, Summilux below:

lct · 04.05.2008, 10:54

Contrast, bokeh, CA.
100% crops, f/5.6 & f/8, Summilux below:

lct · 04.05.2008, 12:12

Colors.
Full frame, f/8, Summilux below.
The focal length of the CV is slightly longer.
Pics taken within the same minute, tripod, aperture priority AE, same shutter speed (1/500s).

lct · 04.05.2008, 12:14

Same pics as above, 100% crops, Summilux below:

lct · 04.05.2008, 16:05

Flare.
1000 watt halogen lamp, f/1.4 & f/2 (Summilux below):

lct · 04.05.2008, 16:07

1000 watt halogen lamp, f/2.8 & f/5.6 (Summilux below):

lct · 04.05.2008, 16:49

Outdoor flare, f/4, hoods in (Summilux below):

sreidvt · 04.05.2008, 17:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by harmsr

Hey LCT,

It seems that your CV is on at 1.4 but focus shifts as you stop down. It seems that your Lux is front focussed at 1.4 then focus shifts as you stop down bringing the focus in.

Otherwise the appear to draw in a similar fashion.

Best,

Ray

Exactly what I said too in another thread.

Cheers,

Sean

Fernmelder · 27.10.2008, 19:19

all pics gone *sigh*

lct · 27.10.2008, 19:49

Sorry my fault, i was using a relative's site that is not available any more. In one word the CV 35/1.4 SC flares more than the late Summilux 35/1.4 pre-asph but it is sharper than the latter at f/1.4 with the same smooh bokeh. At f/2 it's more or less a draw. From f/2.8 to f/5.6, it is difficult to get sharp results with the CV but my experience is limited then as i use the lens at full aperture essentially. According to Sean Reid, this difficulty would be due to focus shift. Cheers. LCT.

03.05.2008, 22:53	#1 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 CV 35/1.4 SC (single coated) vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4. R-D1, 200 iso, subject distance 1.2 meter, raws developped with Silkypix. Full frame, Summilux, f/ 8:

03.05.2008, 22:54	#2 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 100% crops, f/1.4, Summilux below:

03.05.2008, 22:55	#3 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 100% crops, f/2, Summilux below:

03.05.2008, 22:56	#4 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 100% crops, f/2.8, Summilux below:

03.05.2008, 22:56	#5 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 100% crops, f/4, Summilux below:

03.05.2008, 22:57	#6 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 100% crops, f/5.6, Summilux below:

03.05.2008, 22:58	#7 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 100% crops, f/8, Summilux below:

04.05.2008, 01:32	#8 (permalink)
harmsr Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 10.10.2005 Location: Arizona, USA Posts: 522	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Hey LCT, It seems that your CV is on at 1.4 but focus shifts as you stop down. It seems that your Lux is front focussed at 1.4 then focus shifts as you stop down bringing the focus in. Otherwise the appear to draw in a similar fashion. Best, Ray

04.05.2008, 10:50	#9 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Contrast, bokeh, CA. Full frame, f/ 8, Summilux below:

04.05.2008, 10:52	#10 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Contrast, bokeh, CA. 100% crops, f/1.4 & f/2, Summilux below:

04.05.2008, 10:53	#11 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Contrast, bokeh, CA. 100% crops, f/2.8 & f/4, Summilux below:

04.05.2008, 10:54	#12 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Contrast, bokeh, CA. 100% crops, f/5.6 & f/8, Summilux below:

04.05.2008, 12:12	#13 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Colors. Full frame, f/8, Summilux below. The focal length of the CV is slightly longer. Pics taken within the same minute, tripod, aperture priority AE, same shutter speed (1/500s). Last edited by lct; 04.05.2008 at 12:16.

04.05.2008, 12:14	#14 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Same pics as above, 100% crops, Summilux below:

04.05.2008, 16:05	#15 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Flare. 1000 watt halogen lamp, f/1.4 & f/2 (Summilux below):

04.05.2008, 16:07	#16 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 1000 watt halogen lamp, f/2.8 & f/5.6 (Summilux below):

04.05.2008, 16:49	#17 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Outdoor flare, f/4, hoods in (Summilux below):

27.10.2008, 19:19	#19 (permalink)
Fernmelder Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 15.11.2007 Posts: 1,084	AW: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 all pics gone sigh

27.10.2008, 19:49	#20 (permalink)
lct Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 04.01.2004 Posts: 3,920	Re: CV 35/1.4 SC vs late Summilux pre-asph 35/1.4 Sorry my fault, i was using a relative's site that is not available any more. In one word the CV 35/1.4 SC flares more than the late Summilux 35/1.4 pre-asph but it is sharper than the latter at f/1.4 with the same smooh bokeh. At f/2 it's more or less a draw. From f/2.8 to f/5.6, it is difficult to get sharp results with the CV but my experience is limited then as i use the lens at full aperture essentially. According to Sean Reid, this difficulty would be due to focus shift. Cheers. LCT.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Welcome to the Leica Camera Forum!