Jump to content

Mac Pro Additional Memory


Bill W

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

A few months back I bought a new Mac Pro desktop. It is a quad-core 3.2ghz and from the factory comes with 6gb of memory. I want to upgrade this but thought I would ask what others consider as adequate. I run Photoshop CS5. I am thinking about 16gb or 32. Your advice is welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Simon,

That was my thinking but I thought I would get some advice before ordering. The difference is $200 to go from 16 to 32.

 

 

Hi Bill,

 

I think the extra $200 will make your system more future proof.

That's only important if you keep your system for a very long time as I typically do keep mine.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill,

 

I think the extra $200 will make your system more future proof.

That's only important if you keep your system for a very long time as I typically do keep mine.

I will probably keep this system for a while. The one it replaced was about 6 years old. I will consider the 32gb upgrade. It is $370 vs $170 for the 16gb.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is unlikely, but do some research on your machine's model number and make sure it will support, and see, 32GB. Coming with an odd amount of memory (6GB) it might be old enough to have 16GB ceiling on what it will support.

 

s-a

My Mac is only 6 months old. It came with 6 gb in three slots. It has a total of 4 and will support up to 32gb based on my model according to Mac support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill,

 

Which model Mac Pro do you have?

Is it the late 2013 Mac Pro that has Thunderbolt?

Or is it an earlier model?

TIA.

It is a 5.1 if that helps and is a 3.2gig quad processor. Apple's designations are kind of goofy. I bought it just before the current ones shipped. I think it was the last one my Apple store had in stock. I wanted one with internal drives as I was moving mine over from my older unit. I use 4 drives for a total of 2.5tb. If I recall mine does not have Thunderbolt. I had to hunt for the monitor because they had changed them for the new Macs that look like little cylinders.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is unlikely, but do some research on your machine's model number and make sure it will support, and see, 32GB. Coming with an odd amount of memory (6GB) it might be old enough to have 16GB ceiling on what it will support.

 

s-a

 

Despite the original factory spec, even older MacPros can take 4x8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have up graded to 16 on previous Macs. My desktop pro came with 6. To be honest, I really see little difference even with 36 MB D800 files.

 

if and when I upgrade, I will again purchase from "Other World Computing" in Woodstock, illinois.

 

I believe the biggest issue to a slow computer is having the HD too full. I use 50% max. Off load old info to another drive.

 

Mine has 4 drives, original, a partitioned second with a clone of original after all programs loaded including OS (5%) & time machine (95%), file storage, secondary file storage.

 

I used Super Duper to clone OS + programs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 32GB in my Mac Pro 3.2 Quad Nehalem 2013 model like yours. For my DMR and M9 files, perfect. It's fine until I start using files from my new S 006 in LR5. Then it slows down again! Grrr!

 

Edit - after increasing the Cache size to 5.0GB in Preferences in LR5, it's much faster with the S 006 files :)

Edited by topoxforddoc
Link to post
Share on other sites

For Bill's new computer Apple recommends up to 32 GB of RAM.

Some folks have successfully used 48 GB. That's a risk I wouldn't take.

 

I highly recommend booting any Mac from an SSD if it doesn't already come with flash storage.

That, together with sufficient RAM, will cut down excessive wear and tear by avoiding too much heat.

My 2 cents.

Edited by k-hawinkler
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 32GB in my Mac Pro 3.2 Quad Nehalem 2013 model like yours. For my DMR and M9 files, perfect. It's fine until I start using files from my new S 006 in LR5. Then it slows down again! Grrr!

 

Edit - after increasing the Cache size to 5.0GB in Preferences in LR5, it's much faster with the S 006 files :)

As much as I would love an S, that will not be a problem in my house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...