Leica User Forum


Go Back   Leica User Forum > International User Forum > Leica Products > Digital Forum

Digital Forum The Leica Digital Forum is for discussions about Leica's Digital cameras.

Reply « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09/01/13, 08:26   #1 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
barjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 25/10/06
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 2,053
Default Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Ad
This is quite remarkable performance and at the top of the heap with only very small differences between it and the very top D800E. High dynamic range (14.3EV), great SNR across the ISO range and color depth (>25 bits). The new M-240 will have quite a challenge producing a sensor that out performs the state of the art Sony sensors and the Zeiss lens is rated the equal of the Leica 35 by Lloyd Chambers and other reviewers very familiar with Leica..
__________________
John

Images to Share

Last edited by barjohn; 09/01/13 at 08:28.
barjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Thank You say...
andyedward (09/01/13), colonel (28/02/13)
Old 09/01/13, 15:17   #2 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
kdriceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02/03/11
Location: USA
Posts: 1,419
Default

It is, no doubt, a great camera, but at $3,000 I would expect a built in viewfinder (hybrid would be nice, but at least an EVF), the ability to change lenses with an ability to use an adapter for 3rd party lenses and phase-detect autofocus instead of contrast-detect. The NEX 6 now has all these features, lacking only the full frame sensor. My guess is that Sony is milking the top of the market for now and will introduce a more complete version of a full frame CSC before long.
kdriceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/01/13, 15:40   #3 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
iedei's Avatar
 
Join Date: 20/08/12
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Posts: 865
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdriceman View Post
It is, no doubt, a great camera, but at $3,000 I would expect a built in viewfinder (hybrid would be nice, but at least an EVF), the ability to change lenses with an ability to use an adapter for 3rd party lenses and phase-detect autofocus instead of contrast-detect. The NEX 6 now has all these features, lacking only the full frame sensor. My guess is that Sony is milking the top of the market for now and will introduce a more complete version of a full frame CSC before long.
i kind of like the idea of a fixed lens, however i agree that i just can't get over the idea of the RX1 not having a viewfinder......i can't take it seriously without it! With the added accessory, it becomes much larger....taller than an M-E, in fact.
__________________
SYED
Leica M5 & Leica M8.1
Elmarit 21mm F2.8
Komura 35mm F3.5
Summicron 40mm F2.0
Summilux 50mm F1.4
Super Rokkor 50mm F1.8
Ricoh GRD-3 & GXR
500px
iedei is offline   Reply With Quote
Thank You says
squarenegs (04/02/13)
Old 09/01/13, 16:40   #4 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 12/12/11
Posts: 2,945
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

There's just something about the colour and contrast and the way it swallows up the detail and micro contrast that makes pictures look a bit amateur IMO. Like a cheap dSLR albeit with a decent lens. Perhaps it's just the sample I've seen.
__________________
Perception. Not perfection
Paul J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/01/13, 16:51   #5 (permalink)
Neuer Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/07/11
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 22
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

When the RX-1 was first announced I too was ready to dismiss it. The lack of a viewfinder made it difficult to take seriously. However, after several individuals whose opinions on equipment I trust completely highly recommended the camera I gave it a shot, with the intention that if it really didn't work out I would return it.

Upon first using the camera, it became clear with the goals of the design team were. They wanted to build a FF compact to be as absolutely small as possible. Its clear from handling the camera that adding an EVF would increase size, making the mount take interchangeable lenses would also increase the size. Of course, not everyone will be comfortable with the compromises made to get to a FF compact of this size. Then again, there are many people who think the compromises made to get to a compact FF rangefinder like the M9 are too much.

For myself, the 35 ASPH FLE is usually the lens stuck on my M9, its a lens I love and 35mm has always given me a FOV I've liked. After getting the RX-1, I think in many cases I'd rather use it than the M9+35 FLE. That said, optically speaking the RX-1 lens is simply superb, but its also no 35 FLE (no idea what the 35 'cron is line since I've never owned one).
thedigitalbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/01/13, 19:25   #6 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 26/08/12
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 418
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedigitalbean View Post
but its also no 35 FLE (no idea what the 35 'cron is line since I've never owned one).
the lux FLE has the advantage of 1 stop, FLE helps close up performance and focus shift issue and faster transition from focus to blur. in real world use, at equal aperture, they are EXTREMELY close, you would really need to pixel peep to see any discernible difference. so basically, you pay extra for that 3D look @ F/1.4 (and the 1 stop ofc)
Tonki-M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/01/13, 08:22   #7 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 30/10/06
Location: USA
Posts: 1,662
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul J View Post
There's just something about the colour and contrast and the way it swallows up the detail and micro contrast that makes pictures look a bit amateur IMO. Like a cheap dSLR albeit with a decent lens. Perhaps it's just the sample I've seen.
You might refer to the Sonnar lens rendering. Have a look at M9 files shot with the ZM 50 Sonnar at f1.5 and f2 for comparison.
Ecaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13/01/13, 07:29   #8 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
barjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 25/10/06
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 2,053
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

There are three basic links in the production of the image, the lens, sensor and processing software. You can never get better than the weakest link. In the M9, the weakest link is the sensor. Leica obviously works hard in the software to try and overcome the weakness in the sensor (see DXO Mark evaluation) but there are limits to what can be done in processing and they do a very good job with what they have. The RX1 has one of the best sensors on the market today and an excellent lens. The software is very good but probably not as mature as the software on the M9. The images are superb as has been reported by many M9 owners and reviewers.
__________________
John

Images to Share
barjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13/01/13, 09:18   #9 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14/09/04
Location: Behind a Red Dot
Posts: 36,974
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Uh- no. The weakest link analogy is faulty. The final quality is a combined result of the factors involved. Improve one without the other and quality still goes up.

Please note that DxO measures the results of the files out of camera, not the sensor output.
All digital cooking by the firmware is included, making sensor comparisons based on their measurement rather doubtful, to put it mildly.
But the site has very pretty graphs.
__________________
Jaap

WWW.JAAPVPHOTOGRAPHY.EU

Posts in blue bold font are made as a moderator

Leica user since 1976
jaapv is offline   Reply With Quote
Thank You says
Tonki-M (15/01/13)
Old 14/01/13, 23:44   #10 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 15/07/06
Posts: 1,054
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Whatever. Fact remains that the RX1 combo yields really good IQ.
Peter D Lux 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15/01/13, 15:16   #11 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14/09/04
Location: Behind a Red Dot
Posts: 36,974
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Ad
Nobody is disputing that.
__________________
Jaap

WWW.JAAPVPHOTOGRAPHY.EU

Posts in blue bold font are made as a moderator

Leica user since 1976
jaapv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15/01/13, 16:27   #12 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 30/10/06
Location: USA
Posts: 1,662
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv View Post
Uh- no. The weakest link analogy is faulty. The final quality is a combined result of the factors involved. Improve one without the other and quality still goes up.

Please note that DxO measures the results of the files out of camera, not the sensor output.
All digital cooking by the firmware is included, making sensor comparisons based on their measurement rather doubtful, to put it mildly.
But the site has very pretty graphs.
As a user what I get is the "result out of the camera". Even the RAW files get some cooking, don't they.
Ecaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15/01/13, 16:37   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14/09/04
Location: Behind a Red Dot
Posts: 36,974
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

True - but there is a difference between the very strong in-camera processing of a small-sensor CMos P&S and the minimally worked-on output from a CCD based MF camera (or Leica M for that matter). DxO does not take that into account with their rankings, which makes for some weird results.
__________________
Jaap

WWW.JAAPVPHOTOGRAPHY.EU

Posts in blue bold font are made as a moderator

Leica user since 1976
jaapv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16/01/13, 07:22   #14 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
barjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 25/10/06
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 2,053
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv View Post
True - but there is a difference between the very strong in-camera processing of a small-sensor CMos P&S and the minimally worked-on output from a CCD based MF camera (or Leica M for that matter). DxO does not take that into account with their rankings, which makes for some weird results.
The M's work on moire reduction, color shift problems, and vignetting in processing the RAW files in camera based on lens identification. I don't think one can call that minimal processing. For all we know they may also do work on noise reduction.
__________________
John

Images to Share
barjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16/01/13, 07:26   #15 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
barjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 25/10/06
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 2,053
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv View Post
Uh- no. The weakest link analogy is faulty. The final quality is a combined result of the factors involved. Improve one without the other and quality still goes up.

Please note that DxO measures the results of the files out of camera, not the sensor output.
All digital cooking by the firmware is included, making sensor comparisons based on their measurement rather doubtful, to put it mildly.
But the site has very pretty graphs.
I have to disagree. If the lens produced a weak blurry picture all of the improvements in the world to the sensor and processing would not improve the image. If the sensor produces smeary images with color shifts and other strange artifacts, no matter how good the lens or how you improved the processing would you make for a better image. The final product can be no better than the weakest link in the chain.
__________________
John

Images to Share
barjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Thank You says
andyedward (18/01/13)
Old 16/01/13, 10:03   #16 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14/09/04
Location: Behind a Red Dot
Posts: 36,974
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by barjohn View Post
The M's work on moire reduction, color shift problems, and vignetting in processing the RAW files in camera based on lens identification. I don't think one can call that minimal processing. For all we know they may also do work on noise reduction.
The M8 does no noise reduction, the M9 has a minimal amount for noise that cannot be addressed in post at high iso and a shifted black point. Yes you are right Leica does apply some necessary manipulations to the raw data, but compared to some other cameras it is very minimal.
__________________
Jaap

WWW.JAAPVPHOTOGRAPHY.EU

Posts in blue bold font are made as a moderator

Leica user since 1976
jaapv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16/01/13, 10:07   #17 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14/09/04
Location: Behind a Red Dot
Posts: 36,974
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by barjohn View Post
I have to disagree. If the lens produced a weak blurry picture all of the improvements in the world to the sensor and processing would not improve the image. If the sensor produces smeary images with color shifts and other strange artifacts, no matter how good the lens or how you improved the processing would you make for a better image. The final product can be no better than the weakest link in the chain.
No that is not correct. A blurry lens will still deliver an improved image on a better sensor. Or, if you prefer to put it the other way around, an even worse image on an inferior sensor.
__________________
Jaap

WWW.JAAPVPHOTOGRAPHY.EU

Posts in blue bold font are made as a moderator

Leica user since 1976
jaapv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17/01/13, 17:58   #18 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 28/02/08
Location: Earith, Cambs, UK
Posts: 2,103
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

I'd love to be able to comment on the image quality from the RX1 ..... I received mine yesterday, but it didn't work!
________________
Cheers, Tom
lanetomlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Thank You says
withoutone (17/06/13)
Old 18/01/13, 15:53   #19 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
barjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 25/10/06
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 2,053
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv View Post
The M8 does no noise reduction, the M9 has a minimal amount for noise that cannot be addressed in post at high iso and a shifted black point. Yes you are right Leica does apply some necessary manipulations to the raw data, but compared to some other cameras it is very minimal.
I guess it depends on your definition of minimal. Some cameras do noise reduction on RAWs and that is about it. One could call that minimal compared to the intense processing required to deal with color shifts in the M9.

An improved blurry image is still a blurry image.
__________________
John

Images to Share
barjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Thank You says
earful (20/01/13)
Old 26/01/13, 23:27   #20 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
myshkine's Avatar
 
Join Date: 18/03/10
Location: Europe
Posts: 470
Default Re: Sony RX1 Ranked #4 on DXO Mark at 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdriceman View Post
It is, no doubt, a great camera, but at $3,000 I would expect a built in viewfinder (hybrid would be nice, but at least an EVF), the ability to change lenses with an ability to use an adapter for 3rd party lenses and phase-detect autofocus instead of contrast-detect. The NEX 6 now has all these features, lacking only the full frame sensor. My guess is that Sony is milking the top of the market for now and will introduce a more complete version of a full frame CSC before long.
I agree. Maybe the RX1 is just an experiment, to see how the market reacts and what technical results it achieves. It may well be followed by a "full size" version, one with EVF (or even a hybrid) and interchangeable lenses, on the footsteps of Fuji.
__________________
<><><><><><><><><><>
Sebastiano
myshkine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Current eBay Ads
Current bid:
62 GBP
(11 bids)
Current bid:
3100 GBP
(3 bids)

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© juergensen.net - Andreas Jürgensen