|
||||||||
| Digital Forum The Leica Digital Forum is for discussions about Leica's Digital cameras. |
The Leica Camera Forum is the biggest Leica community worldwide.
Please register, if you want to use all features of the Leica Forum.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free!
![]() |
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
|
|
LinkBack (5) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Benutzer
Join Date: 13.12.2006
Location: Schaumburg, IL USA
Posts: 30
|
Having read much of what has been said on the forum regarding sensor cleaning I took it upon myself to contact the Image Sensor group at Kodak to determine how Kodak, the designer and manufacturer of the KAF-10500 image sensor for the Leica M8, cleans this sensor during manufacturing and what methods they can recommend for the end user.
I spoke with Mr. Bob McKeever who graciously gave his time to the discussion and here is a summary of the conversation: 1. The KAF-10500 does use ITO (Indium Tin Oxide) technology but this is used in the design of the sensor itself and not on the cover glass. 2. The KAF-10500 cover glass is coated on both the top and bottom surface with an AR (anti-reflective) coating. 3. The Kodak Application Note MTD/PS-0237 on cover glass cleaning, Revision 2 dated 2001 is a valid document for the cleaning of the KAF-10500 cover glass. 4. Kodak uses a high grade iso propanol or 200 proof Ethyl Alcohol for cover glass cleaning. Kodak does not use or recommend Methanol because it has poorer cleaning properties, is toxic, and, if denatured, the denaturing components can leave a residue. 5. The only item out of date in the Application Note is the recommendation to use Kodak lens cleaning paper, catalog number 154 6027. Kodak no longer manufactures lens cleaning paper. An equivalent paper for cleaning precision optics could also be used. 6. Kodak cannot recommend specific third party cleaning fluids because if Kodak tested a sample of a third party fluid today and found it acceptable, there is no guarantee that the manufacturer would not change the formulation at a later time. So there it is from Kodak, the desiner and manufacturer of the KAF-10500 sensor manufactured for Leica and the M8. I hope this information has been helpful. I have used Isopropanol to clean the sensor in my M8 and it worked quite well. Though next time, I will try to use a higher concentration as with 70% technical grade, it had a bit too much water which was slow to evaporate. After a few tries though, I was able to get the wetting just right for a spotless swipe. Regards, Michael |
|
|
|
| Advertisement (gone after free registration) |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 27.03.2003
Posts: 3,471
|
Bravo, Michael!
Go to the source and get the answer! Good for you! (But hasn't that killed our endless-thread forum fun? Thank goodness!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 11.11.2006
Posts: 1,357
|
Ditto thanks, well done for cutting through the... err... dust!
;-) Tim
__________________
http://tashley1.zenfolio.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Benutzer
Join Date: 13.12.2006
Location: Schaumburg, IL USA
Posts: 30
|
Alan, I do not know what therd party fluids would be appropriate. I am a bit puzzled by the preference of so many people for Eclipse cleaning fluid. I have never used this but from my limited understanding, the original Eclipse fluid contains Methanol which is contrary to Kodaks preference. I do not know what the composition of their new E2 fluid is but my guess is that a pint of 200 proof Ethanol or a good grade of isopropanol is less expensive than a pint of Eclipse.
I tried to find Eclipse in three different camera stores (two were Leica dealers) in Amsterdam last week while on vacation and none had any. A local pharmacy was able to supply a 100 ml bottle of high purity 70% isopropanol for 5 Euro. I would prefer a higher concentration as explained in the original post. Time to get out the Fisher Scientific catalog! Regards, Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 14.03.2007
Location: Sudbury
Posts: 393
|
Thanks for the research.
I am a bit puzzled about the methyl alcohol and denatured bit, since it is ethanol that gets denatured. How good a grade do we need? If residue of less than .001% (10 ppm) is good enough, then 500ml is priced by sciencelab.com at $19.50 the 120ml bottle Isopropyl Alcohol, Reagent, ACS - Nucleic Acid Purification * 67-63-0 -bob Last edited by rwfreund; 04.04.2007 at 03:57. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 07.11.2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,316
|
Ethyl alcohol is what you drink. It is in every brand of liquor, beer, wine you name it if it is fit to drink, IE not a poison.
Methyl alcohol is wood alcohol. It IS poison. To denature something it to make it unfit for human consumption. They can add methyl alcohol to Ethyl alcohol so it is a poison and unfit for human consumption, it is a denaturant. If they didn't you would need to pay the tax on it just like you do on a bottle of whiskey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 06.02.2004
Posts: 2,261
|
The compostion of the Eclipse and Eclipse E2 fluids can be found in the MSDS sheets. Eclipse is 100% Methanol, Eclipse E2 is composed of Ethyl Alcohol, Methyl Alcohol and Isopropyl Alcohol .
http://www.photosol.com/documents/ms...pe_eclipse.pdf http://www.photosol.com/documents/MSDS%20-%20E2.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 25.01.2006
Posts: 679
|
Quote:
Be warned however, the stuff is so hydroscopic that if you try to drink it straight, it sucks the water out of the tissues in your throat causing your throught to constrict and may cause death. Put a little Wild Turkey 101 in it to dilute it Rex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 18.02.2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,901
|
Thanks Michael, much appreciated.
This information matches what came via Guy from Stefan Daniels Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 17.12.2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 338
|
I think I will dump out my Eclipse fluid and replace it with Everclear in the bottle. If Kodak ships the sensors clean, Leica renders them dirty in the manufacturing process prior to shipping. Even though I am extremely careful, I sitll get spots on the sensor. I wonder if the actuating of the shutter throws off some sort of residue that is picked up by the sensor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 25.12.2003
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,507
|
Quote:
500 ML should be enough for just about every M8 owner on the forum. Cheers!!
__________________
Brent The hardest thing is to photograph a black cat in a dark room. Especially if there is no cat. Last edited by fotografr; 04.04.2007 at 19:27. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 21.09.2002
Posts: 362
|
Spoke with Joel at Photographic solutions, the makers of Eclipse and Eclipse E2. I e-mailed him this thread and asked for his comments.
In summary, he stated the following: 1. They have been making Eclipse for the past ten years and have only had to replace 3 sensors during that time. They stand behind their product. 2. Eclipse E2 is the next generation solvent and contains both methanol and ethanol. It is to REPLACE Eclipse in the future as it is a better solvent, having ethanol as a component. 3. Eclipse E2 was developed by SONY for cleaning of CCD sensors and is licensed ( I assume) to Photographic solutions. ![]() I asked Joel to post a message on this thread so as to clarify everything. The debate rages on.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 28.08.2006
Posts: 883
|
I think the answers are very clear ..... "use standard Eclipse or E2 as you please but nobody will guarantee anything" ...... but from all the answers i can't imagine a sensor cleaning with standard eclipse every 4-5 months will damage the M8 sensor in any way ... because NOBODY (Leica, Photosol, Kodak) takes this thread serious enough for a strong warning against using conventional Eclipse. Which was good enough for all cameras for many years!
Sensor cleaning, batteries, chargers, focus accuracy of lenses .... seems like everything is rocket-science these days ...... ![]() Last edited by j. borger; 04.04.2007 at 20:25. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 27.03.2003
Posts: 3,471
|
I don't agree that "the debate rages on."
Michael asked Kodak what they use to clean sensors with, and they answered. On another thread, Leica told us what they use. Now Al has asked Photo Solutions to take a stance. Super, but not on topic. Of course they stand behind their product and can enumerate its advantages. We wouldn't expect them to say, "Well, yeah. Kodak's way is better and cheaper. We just change formulas from time to time to keep our product in people's minds." (Oh, and a little ego digression: I surmised that Eclipse E2 would be the replacement for Eclipse on another thread as well.) And as JB said, Eclipse has been good enough for years and will continue to be good enough till it's replaced. To me, there isn't a "debate." Any commercial product is fine, or we can go the way Kodak goes. Until we get a camera with a sensor of different materials, we're fine as we are. And just for completeness' sake, someone ought to call Sony and find out what they use for sensor cleaning, since they've now been implicated in the development of Eclipse E2. ![]() Thanks, Dr Knapp, for requesting a source for high-grade ethanol, and thanks, Brent, for supplying the information! --HC Last edited by ho_co; 04.04.2007 at 22:06. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 25.12.2003
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,507
|
Quote:
__________________
Brent The hardest thing is to photograph a black cat in a dark room. Especially if there is no cat. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-forum/20799-sensor-cleaning-kodak-speaks.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Re: It's what you want to use: Leica Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review | This thread | Refback | 09.03.2009 17:16 | |
| phorum - quipements et procds - nettoyage diapos+caches : isopropanol ? | This thread | Refback | 20.04.2008 14:00 | |
| on auspiciousdragon.net | photostream | This thread | Refback | 15.09.2007 01:12 | |
| Tin Oxide coated sensors | photostream | This thread | Refback | 07.09.2007 23:47 | |
| on auspiciousdragon.net | photostream | This thread | Refback | 07.09.2007 21:47 | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kodak and the M8 sensor | Photoskeptic | Leica M8 Forum | 13 | 02.04.2007 18:22 |
| M8's Kodak Sensor | MP3 | Digital Forum | 62 | 11.03.2007 16:38 |
| Kodak Batteries | Annibale G. | Customer Forum | 1 | 18.01.2007 15:04 |
| Diafilm Kodak Elite Chrom | lauck | Leica Kundenforum | 6 | 12.01.2007 15:58 |
| Kodak Portra überarbeitet | zwicko | Leica Kundenforum | 1 | 12.09.2006 15:01 |