Leica User Forum


Go Back   Leica User Forum > International User Forum > Digital Forum
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Digital Forum The Leica Digital Forum is for discussions about Leica's Digital cameras.

Welcome to the Leica Camera Forum!

The Leica Camera Forum is the biggest Leica community worldwide.

Please register, if you want to use all features of the Leica Forum!

Your advantages as registered member:
  • Access to all sections and images
  • Posting own topics and postings
  • Access to the buy & sell section

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free!
 

Register here!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12/19/06, 02:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

An M8 with the hardware changes (M8.2?) arrived today for testing. I'm just doing some casual tests to start with but here are some notes and questions:

I'm photographing our Christmas tree right now to see if I can invoke the light streaking that affected previous M8s. So far, I can't see any evidence of it at any ISO. Will be testing "old" M8 and "new" M8 side by side.

Christmas lights (ours at least) are heavy in IR radiation; just full of it, in fact. The Schneider filters pulled all of the color cast. I will be testing this against the B+W 486 and the Heliopan.

This camera has firmware 1.09 and, with the filter on a 21 Elm. Aspherical, there is little vignetting or cyan drift (red vignetting) evident in this picture series.

I have not yet seen the banding, that Ray and Jorge T. have discussed, at any ISO. I would think that a Christmas tree in a dim room would invoke this but I haven't seen a trace yet. Ray, if you have a specific subject/lighting condition you'd like to try, let me know and I'll try it if I can.

I haven't yet seen filter flare with this MRC 486 filter on the Elm. 28, even when shooting straight into these Christmas lights. The jury is still out on other lenses with that filter on the M8. Again, if someone has "favorite" (?) conditions that have invoked this, please let me know.

Cheers,

Sean
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 03:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
waterlenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10/09/05
Location: Alaska
Posts: 441
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Quote:
Originally Posted by sean_reid

I have not yet seen the banding, that Ray and Jorge T. have discussed, at any ISO. I would think that a Christmas tree in a dim room would invoke this but I haven't seen a trace yet. Ray, if you have a specific subject/lighting condition you'd like to try, let me know and I'll try it if I can.
None of the newly discovered vertical banding, just to the right of center?
Tom
waterlenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 03:13 AM   #3 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Quote:
Originally Posted by waterlenz
None of the newly discovered vertical banding, just to the right of center?
Tom
I haven't seen a trace of it yet. I also have access to a second "revised" body that I'll test as well.

Cheers,

Sean
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 03:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

This is with the 21 Elm at ISO 1250 with a B+W 486 filter mounted. I've yet to see the vertical band from this camera.

Cheers,

Sean
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1250noband.jpg (169.3 KB, 1194 views)
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 04:12 AM   #5 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Here's a picture from the same vantage point, same workflow, etc. but at ISO 320 with B+W 486 filter:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 320noband_ISO320.jpg (160.2 KB, 1168 views)
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 04:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Exacty as above (at ISO 320) but with no filter.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 320noband_nofilt.jpg (157.6 KB, 1147 views)
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 04:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
robsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02/06/04
Posts: 2,015
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

One of those ornaments is not like the others
robsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 04:29 AM   #8 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 08/05/04
Location: Montreal
Posts: 362
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Quote:
Originally Posted by robsteve
One of those ornaments is not like the others
Ya it's funny but I have one just like it.
canlogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 04:30 AM   #9 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Quote:
Originally Posted by robsteve
One of those ornaments is not like the others
Ancient family tradition...we hang a WhiBal on the tree for good luck in the new year. <G>

Cheers,

Sean
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 04:42 AM   #10 (permalink)
Neuer Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/09/06
Posts: 11
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

It is good to see positive results.

That "ornament" has saved me lots of time in pp

harvey
hgmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 04:43 AM   #11 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Again, same with no filter but this time processed with Jamie's profile.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3101785_nofiltJRProfile_L1000034-1.jpg (153.2 KB, 1099 views)
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 05:08 AM   #12 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 08/16/05
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,206
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Well these are not good shots but all at ISO 2500 and I see nothing just that one that was a blank frame
Attached Images
File Type: jpg L1121696.JPG (115.0 KB, 1084 views)
File Type: jpg L1121698.JPG (141.4 KB, 1076 views)
File Type: jpg L1121701.JPG (157.8 KB, 1064 views)
File Type: jpg L1121704.JPG (195.9 KB, 1050 views)
File Type: jpg L1121706.JPG (196.2 KB, 1036 views)
__________________
Guy Mancuso
www.guymancusophoto.com

Upcoming GetDPI.com Photographic Workshops

"It's not always about what the client will accept but about what you want to deliver to your client."
guy_mancuso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 05:12 AM   #13 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 08/16/05
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,206
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

The first one was shot without a lens at 160 the rest were 2500 to follow
Attached Images
File Type: jpg L1121691.JPG (48.5 KB, 1027 views)
File Type: jpg L1121706.JPG (196.2 KB, 1026 views)
File Type: jpg L1121705.JPG (146.7 KB, 1011 views)
__________________
Guy Mancuso
www.guymancusophoto.com

Upcoming GetDPI.com Photographic Workshops

"It's not always about what the client will accept but about what you want to deliver to your client."
guy_mancuso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 05:13 AM   #14 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 08/16/05
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,206
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

All of mine were with the B+W 486 and the 28mm F2
__________________
Guy Mancuso
www.guymancusophoto.com

Upcoming GetDPI.com Photographic Workshops

"It's not always about what the client will accept but about what you want to deliver to your client."
guy_mancuso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 05:21 AM   #15 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 08/16/05
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,206
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Wait these are all done in C1 .The one blank i showed on the othere thread was in ACR and it showed . In C1 it is not there, and i turned everything off in C1 with regards to banding and noise. Hmmm

i am going to process that black one again in both just to be sure
__________________
Guy Mancuso
www.guymancusophoto.com

Upcoming GetDPI.com Photographic Workshops

"It's not always about what the client will accept but about what you want to deliver to your client."
guy_mancuso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 05:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11/17/04
Posts: 4,752
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

I'll keep an eye out for this vertical streak but it may be that it's only present in some cameras. Too soon to say...

All mine were done in C1 as well.

Cheers,

Sean
__________________
Sean Reid
http://www.reidreviews.com

Last edited by sean_reid : 12/19/06 at 05:25 AM.
sean_reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 05:28 AM   #17 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 08/16/05
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,206
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

1st one is ACR and the exposure control is all the way up on both of them . 2nd one is C1 with every noise filter off and nothing there
Attached Images
File Type: jpg acr.JPG (101.1 KB, 1012 views)
File Type: jpg c1.JPG (47.8 KB, 1004 views)
__________________
Guy Mancuso
www.guymancusophoto.com

Upcoming GetDPI.com Photographic Workshops

"It's not always about what the client will accept but about what you want to deliver to your client."
guy_mancuso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 05:47 AM   #18 (permalink)
Benutzer
 
Join Date: 09/15/06
Posts: 88
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Guy,

It there clear as daylight in the first picture of post #17.

It is also in the first picture with the book shelf. It starts on the right side of the bracket holding the shelf up.

Look at your monitor from a different angle for the one onpost #17

Last edited by leicawanabe : 12/19/06 at 05:51 AM.
leicawanabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 06:07 AM   #19 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
harmsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10/10/05
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 523
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Guy,

Lindsay is correct. It is in the one with the bookshelf.

Last edited by harmsr : 12/19/06 at 06:24 AM.
harmsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12/19/06, 06:10 AM   #20 (permalink)
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
rvaubel's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01/25/06
Posts: 679
Default Re: Some Thoughts With First Test of Revised M8

Quote:
Originally Posted by leicawanabe
Guy,

It there clear as daylight in the first picture of post #17.

It is also in the first picture with the book shelf. It starts on the right side of the bracket holding the shelf up.

Look at your monitor from a different angle for the one onpost #17
I see the vertical in post# 17 top. Also there is a weaker horizontal band down about 20% from the top

I also see the book shelf vertical, but it fades out once it gets out of the shadows.

What I am surprised at is the difference when processed in C1. Not only is the banding gone, but there is much less noise. What gives?
Is this a ACR issue? and if so, why?

Rex
rvaubel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
D-Lux 2 Photos - Can there be even better? rick123 Digital Forum 47 12/06/06 12:51 AM
Digilux 1 thomasl.se Digital Forum 32 12/04/06 04:15 PM
Leica's New CEO, Financial Results johnbuckley Digital Forum 11 11/22/06 06:32 PM
X-Rays and Flash Memory jlancasterd Digital Forum 10 08/01/06 06:13 PM
M8 Viewfinder Rolo Digital Forum 86 07/12/06 05:17 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:44 PM.




Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
© juergensen.net - Andreas Jürgensen