View Single Post
Old 07.07.2009, 23:52   #5 (permalink)
plasticman
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 11.01.2006
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,371
Default Re: Heresy: Iridient Raw Dev better than C1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Roberts View Post
It's not heresy at all--lots of people use and swear by Raw Developer. Lots of people use C1.
Personally, I prefer the softness of the sharpening in C1. I have my own output-specific sharpening workflow that doesn't hold up as well with output from other converters.
I didn't realize RawDev was Mac only - sorry about that oversight.

In fact, I had no idea people were using it much at all - which is why I thought I'd write about it here, as I see so many questions and problems posted by people who seem to have trouble with C1, for various reasons.

I'd certainly say that C1 has a far greater wealth of tools and settings, and is itself vastly superior in its renditions of M8 files to LR and even Aperture, but I have to say that seeing all my captures in RawDev over the last day has given me an enormous boost of enthusiasm for the camera - and I thought it was worth sharing.

Incidentally, as you know RD has a comprehensive choice of sharpening algorithms (including 'none', of course). My defaults were something called 'R-L Deconvolution' which (to quote a small part of the description of this technique in the manual):

"...uses Richardson-Lucy deconvolution and is more an image restoration/reconstruction or "refocusing" technique compared to the other 3 options which are more traditional edge contrast enhancing filters... Almost all digital cameras use an anti-aliasing filter which has the effect of slightly blurring the image. Richardson-Lucy in theory is well suited to undoing the effects of such a filter."

The best part about digital is that no-one is forced to use their 'local' developer anymore - so we can all go out and find the one that suits us best!

Mani
plasticman is offline   Reply With Quote