Hi,
I have not seen any really decent reviews of this camera and am left wondering whether it was a real dog, or actually a very good camera. At 100g lighter than the R8, it is the same weight as an EOS3, but a little more compact, but still large for a manual SLR.
Can anyone who has used this camera seriously in the field comment on what it is like? I have seen comments on its surprisingly good ergonomics when up to the eye, but is this real? Its seriously expensive compared to a Nikon FM2n/3a.
I have been thinking about a manual SLR for certain uses,but being used to the Leica M, Nikkor lenses focus in the wrong direction and that is a show stopper.
- Are they reliable?
- Are they intuitive to use?
- Is the finder really as good as has been suggested?
- Whats the shutter noise like? (say compared to an Eos 3/1n/v or Nikon FM2/3?
- What's battery life like?
I have a few Eos 3s and may just stick with these, but there are reasons why the R9 might just have some appeal.
Any help would be greatkly appreciated; however, at first glance it appears that few are out there!