Re: M8/9 as a true system camera offering
I'm not so sure. I don't see rangefinders as 'do-it-all' cameras. It seems like if you want one system to do macro work, super telephoto work, etc., that an SLR would be a better system for you.
Rangefinders have always been good at certain things. Working discreetly, focusing in low-light, wide-angle work, etc. They were never intended as complete system cameras. I know many photojournalists, for example, would carry a leica or two with wide lenses and a Nikon with a 180mm.
It certainly wouldn't bother me if Leica comes out with a new viso, I just don't know if the time and R&D money would be well spent since I believe it would appeal to a very small number of photographers. Especially since, at the price you mention, you could buy a very capable DSLR and a pro-level lens or two.
I think the beauty of the M system is simplicity and I believe Leica would be smart to focus on its strengths. As a small company Leica clearly has limited resources, so I'd like to see those resources spent on making the best digital rangefinder possible, preferably with full frame, better low-light performance, etc.
|