Martin - My workflow is actually a breeze and, this was one of the reasons I went back to film, because of the simplified workflow. See, I was spending way too much time trying to make my digital work look like film and decided to use film to begin with.
Even though I live in Florida, all my film is developed and scanned at my lab in L.A. (
Richard Photo Lab). I overnight all my rolls after a wedding to the lab and within two weeks or less, I receive all the high-res scans and printed proofs. At this point all I have to do is sort the images, remove any bad shots and upload to the client's online gallery. The total time I spend on sorting, uploading and activating gallery is less than an hour. Also, because of my sometimes hectic travel schedule (to give you and idea, I've had 4 weddings and four engagement sessions over the six weeks in New York, L.A., New York again, Italy and Boston) my turning around of the digital work was taking more than I wanted it to be.
I now have more time to network with wedding coordinators and magazine editors than before. I can also concentrate on better servicing my existing clients and taking care of things that are more important to my brand than just sitting at the computer doing post-processing.
BTW, outsourcing my digital RAW conversions was never an option since I had my own post-processing style that is different than the regular digital work you see out there.
Cheers,