View Single Post
Old 05/14/08, 08:34 PM   #45 (permalink)
charlesphoto99
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
Join Date: 09/06/06
Location: Seattle
Posts: 810
Default Re: Low light Photography, the M8 and D3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Roberts View Post
I completely agree with you...Having a dSLR is very handy, and usually for exactly the shots you're mentioning. For me, it's more about reach, though, than anything else; the 180R Elmarit or the Canon longer zooms are nice to have at a ceremony. If I was buying a dSLR today, it would very probably be a D3. Nikon's got some great glas too.

As for crummy light, well, I dunno... While I'm a freak for available light, sometimes the best light available is my flash (that's an old joke, but it's still correct). I realise it can take time to set up, but honestly the M8 and an autoflash is pretty freaking great, and fast too. Not as fast, I suppose, as ETTL and whatever Nikon calls their TTL system, but fast enough for me (as in once its set I don't mess with it much).

I'm always surprised at just how little flash output you need at ISO 640 and f 1.6, and, if used correctly (hardly ever directly) how big an improvement it really makes
I'm actually big on flash - in fact the book I have coming out this fall is almost all flash (b&w medium format with a Quantum and/or Vivitar 285). I need to play around a little more with the M8 and flash. I would get good results with the SF20 and my M7 but not with the M8 for some reason. A bit wary of investing in an SF24 because of the whole pre-flash thing. Just picked up a Nikon SB800 so will have to try that.

I guess it's mostly that developing world crummy light I like most! When there's actual color in the image to make up for it. Crummy light in off white halls is another thing.
__________________
http://www.charlespeterson.net
charlesphoto99 is offline   Reply With Quote