View Single Post
Old May 1st, 2008, 05:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
kdemas
Erfahrener Benutzer
 
kdemas's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 27th, 2003
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 174
Default Re: AW: Re: AW: Now that the Elmar 50/2.8 is discontinued..

I think I would have to take mine and get it refinished in the same "blued Black" of the O-series, love the finish. To your point I think much of the lens could be used as designed, obviously the mount would need changing and it would need to be rangefinder coupled (the O is not).

I wonder if the "front of lens" aperture selection would be kept of a more traditional ring used? For convenience the ring would be nice but I think I would opt for the front selector (though this would cause issues with using IR filters on the M8). By keeping it in front the lens maintains a bit more "slight" appearance which I think really works for this lens.

Kent


Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard View Post
Luigi,

there would be no need to design a completely new lens. Leica could use (and should use) the optical cell of the Anastigmat 3.5/50, which they developed for the replica 0-series. Many mechanical parts of this already existing lens could be used, too. The only new parts would be related to the interchangeable mount (which the 0-series did not have), but those would be relatively few parts. I would think that a run of, say, 1000 lenses could be financially feasible, and I have no doubts that such a lens, if produced as a sort of replica Elmar 3.5/50 - arguably THE most famous Leica lens ever (chrome, of course) - would be swallowed by collectors all over the world.

Regards,

Andreas
__________________
_________________

The question is.... how many 50's can you own before you officially have a screw loose??
www.SendPhotos.com
www.Avanquest.com
kdemas is offline   Reply With Quote