Leica User Forum - View Single Post - Is the Digilux-3 "Seen" as a Leica

ustein · 12/30/06, 01:07 AM

>There are more differences between the two than algorithms.

What are they besides different JPEG processing? With the Digilux 2 the colors for JPEGs were excellent and the RAW was hard to use. With the Digilux 3 the RAW speed is not fast but very reasonable and I am not sure I would use JPEGs only. So far my main issue would be that the files need very strong sharpening which is either the chip or an extremely strong AA filter.

Uwe

FYI: We have a review sample here.

12/30/06, 01:07 AM	#18 (permalink)
ustein Erfahrener Benutzer Join Date: 11/05/06 Posts: 111	Re: Is the Digilux-3 "Seen" as a Leica >There are more differences between the two than algorithms. What are they besides different JPEG processing? With the Digilux 2 the colors for JPEGs were excellent and the RAW was hard to use. With the Digilux 3 the RAW speed is not fast but very reasonable and I am not sure I would use JPEGs only. So far my main issue would be that the files need very strong sharpening which is either the chip or an extremely strong AA filter. Uwe FYI: We have a review sample here.