[egibaud]

Hi,

I have not seen the review, but in general the problem with reviews in magazines is that they make some mathematics instead of photography:

photo quality 99%
easy of use 95%
material quality 98%
price 5%

So the camera ranking drops to the floor

Then you compare to some very basic camera that cost US$150 and you get an overall score of 95%, several points better than a Leica.

Camera review should not evaluate a camera in such a way, and reviewing a professional camera in an amateur magazine is surely interesting but not really useful. It is like reviewing a Bentley or a Rolls Royce in a "everybody's car magazine"